" /> Psycho Sensei: November 2006 Archives

« October 2006 | Main | December 2006 »

November 28, 2006

What is WITH these people?

A peace sign is "Satanic?" Do they check under their beds for Satan before they go to sleep?

Truce declared in peace wreath battle - CNN.com:


DENVER, Colorado (AP) -- A subdivision has withdrawn its threat of $25 daily fines against a homeowner who put a Christmas wreath shaped like a peace sign on the front of her home.

Homeowner Lisa Jensen told The Associated Press on Monday that the board of directors of the Loma Linda Homeowners Association had apologized, called the incident a misunderstanding and had withdrawn its request for the wreath's removal.

Jensen was ordered to take the wreath down when some residents in her 200-home subdivision saw it as a protest of the Iraq war. Bob Kearns, president of the board, also said some saw it as a symbol of Satan.

The homeowners' association demanded Jensen remove the wreath from her house, saying it doesn't allow flags or signs that are considered divisive.

None of the three members of the board in the scenic town 270 miles southwest of Denver was available for comment late Monday. Kearns and colleague Jeff Heitz both had their phone numbers changed to unlisted numbers Monday. Tammy Spezze, the third board member, did not return a call seeking comment.

Jensen, a past association president, said she was overwhelmed with hundreds of calls of support and offers to help her pay the $1,000 fine that would be due if she kept the wreath up until after Christmas.

"We would like to thank everyone who has contacted us with moral support and offers of financial support. We are grateful to hundreds of complete strangers who felt so moved by this story they contacted us," she said.

"It seems whenever someone tries to say 'Peace on Earth' it is met with so much resistance," she said. "The incredible amount of support we have received over the last couple of days really is proof to us of how many people believe in peace and in our right to say it."

November 22, 2006

Law.com - Family of Mother of Missing Boy Sues CNN's Nancy Grace, Says Grilling Led to Suicide

This is really weird. Where does freedom of the press end? Was this even "news?" Do we give sensationalistic shows like this the same privileges as we give Walter Cronkite? How many questions are TOO many questions? :-)

Law.com - Family of Mother of Missing Boy Sues CNN's Nancy Grace, Says Grilling Led to Suicide:


Relatives of a mother who committed suicide after CNN's Nancy Grace aggressively questioned her about the disappearance of her son sued the network and the talk-show host Tuesday, accusing Grace of pushing the woman over the edge.

Melinda Duckett shot herself to death on Sept. 8, one day after taping a segment on Grace's CNN Headline News show in which Grace interrogated Duckett about her whereabouts on the August day that 2-year-old Trenton Duckett was reported missing. The network aired the segment after Melinda Duckett's death.

Investigators have since named Melinda Duckett as the prime suspect in his disappearance.

Jay Paul Deratany, the attorney for Duckett's estate, said that Grace encouraged Duckett to appear on her show by saying the goal was to draw public attention to help find the boy.

"It's not just about the questioning. It's about the misrepresentation with the knowledge that she was emotionally distraught," Deratany said. The attorney said Grace improperly took on the role of a law enforcement officer.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.

CNN Headline News said in a statement: "We stand by Nancy Grace and fully support her, as we have from the beginning of this matter."

MyFox Birmingham | Westboro Hate Group to Protest Funerals for School Bus Victims

Gee, I'm sure these people are going to get a lot of people who agree with them in Alabama this week... NOT.

MyFox Birmingham | Westboro Hate Group to Protest Funerals for School Bus Victims:


BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (WBRC-TV)—  The pastor of Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas, Fred Phelps, makes a habit out of protesting military funerals and homosexuals. Phelps and his group sent out a press release stating their plans to protest the funerals Friday and Saturday in Huntsville because they say, “God hates Alabama and America.”

The religious organization obtained a permit issued by the Huntsville Police Chief on Tuesday to protest near the funerals.

The group is monitored by the Anti-Defamation League and is described as a “hate group” by The Southern Poverty Law Center. Westboro Baptist Church has 150 members that is mainly comprised of family. The families live together behind a large fence in a nine home compound in Topeka, Kansas.

November 21, 2006

California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Free Speech on the Internet

California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Free Speech on the Internet:


San Francisco - In what is a victory for free speech on the Internet, the California Supreme Court ruled today that no provider or user of an interactive computer service may be held liable for putting material on the Internet that was written by someone else. In doing so, the Court overruled an earlier decision by the Court of Appeal.


Today's ruling affirms that blogs, websites, listservs, and ISPs like Yahoo!, as well as individuals like defendant Ilena Rosenthal, are protected under Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act (CDA), which explicitly states that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."


"By reaffirming that Congress intended to grant protection under Section 230 to those who provide a forum for the views of others, the Court has ensured that the Internet will remain a vibrant forum for debate and the free exchange of ideas," said Ann Brick, staff attorney at the ACLU of Northern California. "Any other ruling would have inevitably made speech on the Internet less free."


The issue raised in Barrett v. Rosenthal was whether Section 230's protection applies to individuals who frequently use the Internet to pass on information obtained elsewhere, whether by forwarding an email written by someone else or, as was the case in Barrett, posting an email from someone else to a newsgroup. The ACLU-NC and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed an amicus brief in the California Supreme Court arguing that Section 230 means what it says and applies to "users" of interactive computer services as well as "providers."


"Courts have consistently interpreted Section 230 to provide broad protections for the platforms upon which free speech has flourished online," said EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl. "By reversing the Court of Appeal, the California Supreme Court has brought California back in line with other jurisdictions and reaffirmed the critical rule that the soapbox is not liable for what the speaker has said."


In January 2004, in Barrett v. Rosenthal, the Court of Appeal for the First District overruled the dismissal of a defamation lawsuit filed against an activist for her re-publication on the Internet of someone else's words. The court refused to extend any protection under Section 230, which was expressly enacted "to promote the continued development of the Internet and other interactive computer services," in a manner "unfettered by Federal or State regulation."


"The Supreme Court's opinion strengthens protection for speech on the Internet" said Mark Goldowitz, director of the California Anti-SLAPP Project and counsel for Rosenthal. "Justice Corrigan's opinion protects against the 'heckler's veto' chilling speech on the Internet."

For the full decision, see EFF's website at:
http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/Barrett_v_Rosenthal/ruling.pdf

Contacts:

Kurt Opsahl

Staff Attorney

Electronic Frontier Foundation

kurt@eff.org

Stella Richardson

Media Relations Director

ACLU of Northern California

srichardson@aclunc.org



November 17, 2006

Movie studios sue DVD-to-iPod service

So, you purchase a DVD, which gives you a "license to view" this thing whenever you want to, and suddenly, AFTER you pony up the money to purchase this disc, they attempt to retroactively tell you what you can do with it. It's bad enough that they FORCE you to watch their lame ass commercials (by disabling the fast forward) and try to tell you that you can't take the DVD you purchased to another country to play, but now they're telling you that somehow the content of that disc is somehow magically changed into something illegal if you want to play it on something ELSE.

Does the average consumer even realize that you can't record HD content for our Supreme Court given right of "timeshifting" in any manner not expressly approved by the MPAA? If they don't approve, they will sue the company out of existence. Doesn't matter that we have a constitutional right, doesn't matter who's right or wrong, he with the most money will sue the other into oblivion and our courts sit by and say "gee, that's ok."

I will be SO happy when the world of technology finally trumps their antiquated business model, and those with vision start taking the money away from them.

Movie studios sue DVD-to-iPod service:


The MPAA has sued Load 'N Go Video for offering to load customers' movie collections onto their music players.

Judge won't halt AT&T wiretapping lawsuit

Judge won't halt AT&T wiretapping lawsuit:


San Francisco court says lawsuit alleging the carrier illegally allowed the U.S. government to spy on its customers can continue.

November 09, 2006

A Loss for NH

In Tuesday's election, Manchester's voters replaced one of the better state legislators they had ever had....and I'm not just saying that because she's my mom. J. Gail Barry served 5 terms in a statehouse that pays 125.00 per YEAR for their legislative services. Unlike so many politicians, she actually READ the legislation she was asked to vote on, debated the legislation, asked the important questions, and was one of the most fiscally responsible people ever to serve. She is a Republican, but in the original sense, the one that demands government stay out of affairs it has no business in, leaving freedom and responsibility to the citizens, where it belongs.

Mom took pride in serving her constituency. Her home phone number, email, and physical address were published all over the web so they could call her anytime (and they did). She took a lot of grief for being a pro-choice Republican, but that was totally consistent with her underlying belief in government staying out of the private affairs of women, as well as men. She defended the rights of children, worked for accessible health care for all, and worked to ensure that NH remained one of the only states without a state sales tax or income tax.

When NH voted out the Republicans, the Democrats took 30 of 36 seats in Manchester. It's too bad one of them wasn't reserved for Gail Barry. Only time will tell what comes next for NH.

Musings on the Elections

It isn't often that one's vote is of such importance as it was here in Virginia last Tuesday. It feels rather powerful to be one of the voters who turned the Senate over to the Democrats. However, I have to wonder whether or not this will truly make a difference in the long run. Sure, the rhetoric flew before the elections crowing about "change" and how everything is going to be oh so different if we vote the Republicans out. But now we get to really see whether they can actually put their money where their mouths are.

The Iraqi War was was obviously the sticking point that drove most to the polls. What change can the Democrats make there? They're going to be stuck between an Executive who has taken unprecedented amounts of power under his "war authority," an American public who is divided between "stop the terrorists in Iraq or they will hit us in the US," and the "pull the troops out NOW" factions. If they do nothing, you can bet that they won't gain the White House in 2008.

And what about the "hot button" issues? I was embarrassed by Virginia's vote to amend the state constitution with a buzz word laden but unworkable piece of hate called the "marriage amendment." Civil liberties are going to be a big hot potato issue in the next two years. My prediction is that the Democrats will side step the personal rights issues in order to dance down the middle in order to elect a Democratic president.

And so we wait and see. Unfortunately, I doubt we'll see much of the change we were hoping for. Politics doesn't quite work that way. Politics is instead about kowtowing to those who pay the bills....aka corporate sponsors. And, as such, most of us don't have any real representation. I hope that I am pleasantly surprised, but there is only one way to find out.

Field Guide to Wicca for Non Pagans

I would be grateful for any comments to this. I am trying to write something useful for people so that perhaps I don't see so much discrimination, at least in my own life.

-----
A Field Guide to Wicca for Non Pagans

As the target of at least one evangelical Christian due solely to my religious preferences, I feel that perhaps it's time to address some of the misconceptions that are widely held about Wiccans, in hopes that at least perhaps ONE individual may actually think about what is written before displaying the same knee jerk response that the majority of Virginia voters did when they voted their religious preferences into the Constitution of the Commonwealth.

So what IS Wicca? Although there are many different definitions, I think that they all boil down to one thing - duality of Deity. Whatever an individual Wiccan calls their Deities, whether it be Sprit, "the Gods," "The Lord and Lady" or just "Nature" that Deity is made up of male and female parts, neither superior to the other. As in nature, both parts are necessary to creation of new life and maintenance of what already exists. There it is. That's what Wicca is about.

Please notice that the definition of Wicca does NOT include recruiting people to the cause, controlling political parties, forcing behaviors on others, worshipping dark forces of doom, casting spells on people you don't like (or people you DO like for that matter), or otherwise interfering with the Free Will of others.

Granted, there are many individuals who call themselves Wiccan who do these things. There are many who call themselves Christian who do similar bad things. (As an aside, I feel it's our responsibility to point out when someone has acted outside the bounds of their faith and not to accept such bad behavior as acceptable, but that's another paper).

So, why do some evangelicals and fundamentalists mount hate campaigns from the pulpit, and incite parishioners to attempt to "stamp out" Wicca and Wiccans wherever they can? Why would a religion whose main Deity taught tolerance and respect for others, have people contained within it who not only wish harm on others, but commit it? Perhaps part of it is misinformation. Let's start with addressing some popular misconceptions:

1) Wiccans are Satanists.

This is a tough one to explain to those who don't understand history. Oftentimes, a picture of Pan is held up as "The Wiccan God" and a parallel is drawn between Pan's traditional horns, cloven hooves and tail as proof that Wiccans worship Satan. There are a number of ways to poke holes in this myth, so let's start with some of the most obvious:

There is no "one Wiccan God." Most Wiccans are polytheistic, believing in many Gods. But wouldn't that mean that those Wiccans who DO believe in Pan are Satanists? While it might be tempting to try to tie that up in a neat little package of proof, the facts are quite different. Pan predates Christianity. Despite the desire to universalize both the Christian Deities as well as their Nemesis, the entity of Satan appeared first in the Old Testament as an office ("the Satan," who was similar to a District Attorney, or "devil's advocate" who challenged Job's integrity to the God of the Old Testament 1 Chronicles 21:1 and Zechariah 3:1-2). Satan as evil entity did not appear until Matthew 12:24 in the New Testament.

Satan, being a creature of Christianity, simply is the Christians' issue, not ours. In order to believe in the existence of Satan, one must believe the New Testament's story of his existence and his nature. It is very difficult for many Wiccans to understand that some Christians do not consider their religion a 'belief system" but instead as a "fact system" and can't fathom that this view is not held by Wiccans. We simply do not believe that the New Testament is true, and do not believe that Satan exists. This makes it impossible for Wiccans to be Satanists.

2) But What about the Pentacle? That's a Satanic Symbol!

Untrue. The Pentacle is an ancient Pagan symbol that signifies the five elements of Earth, Air, Fire and Water with a top point representing Spirit. Some use a downward pointing center point which signifies Spirit being the base of the elements. However, this symbol predated Satan, and was adopted by some Satanists in the same way that the Swastika was an ancient Hindu symbol adopted by Adolph Hitler. Most wearing a Pentacle are either Wiccan, or don't know what it means but wear it because "it's cool."

3) Wiccans, Even if Not Satanists, Worship Evil

With all the kids running around dressing "goth" and sporting pentacles, it's difficult for many non Wiccans to understand the difference between practitioners of the Wiccan religion, and practitioners of rebellious behavior. Some teenagers and young adults target those around them (especially parents) with as shocking behavior as possible, and for some, the most shocking possible is for their child to reveal they reject the family's religion in favor of one thought of as "evil."

In reality, Wiccans don't believe in absolute good or absolute evil. The vast majority of Wiccans follow the Wiccan Rede, which states "An it harm none, do what you will." This means that Wiccans strive to harm no one in their daily lives, and carefully consider all consequences before knowingly causing harm to another. This makes it rather difficult to embrace evil, since we believe that the consequences will find you with at least as much harm to you as you dished out.

With popular movies like "The Craft" out there, it's difficult to overcome these preconceived notions. However, as hollywood often exaggerates and outright ignores truth for sensationalism in an equal opportunity manner, everyone is treated in an equally outrageous manner.

4) Wiccans are Witches and Witches are Evil

While many Witches are Wiccans, not all Wiccans are Witches. The way I like to explain it is that Wicca is the religion we follow. To be "a witch" is the way that one may choose to interact with their environment. To be a witch is not to follow any particular religious path. As far as being evil, there are witches who do things that others may not consider appropriate. There are also witches who identify their religion as Christian.

Wiccans, as opposed to Witches, generally follow the Wiccan Rede, which prohibits them from doing wanton acts of "evil." Please keep in mind, however, that what is permitted behavior under Wicca is not the same as permitted behavior under Christianity. If a Wiccan does something prohibited under Christianity, such as homosexual acts, those are not prohibited under our ethical structure, and therefore are not considered "evil" or to be causing harm. On the other hand, committing sexual acts upon anyone who does not consent (which includes children who do not have the capacity to consent) IS causing harm, and is therefore prohibited under Wiccan ethics.

5) Since Wiccans don't believe in God, how can they possibly have morals or ethics?

This is one I've heard quite often. The questioners presuppose a world in which one only does what is "right" if they are afraid of punishment for doing "wrong." They often can't conceive of situations where Atheists, or those who do not believe in the Christian God, could possibly refrain from doing "bad things." Without meaning to be snide, many of us do good simply because it's the right thing to do.

Wiccans do believe in God, but they believe also in Goddess. Most believe in many Gods and many Goddesses. While Wiccans do not have a "hell" where they are punished with eternal damnation if they commit acts contrary to their religious beliefs, they strive in all ways to become closer to their Gods, which includes doing what is right.

6) Wiccans torture and sacrifice animals and babies. That's why they meet secretly in the woods.

While there are many reports of people (normally kids) who torture and murder animals, Wiccans do not do these things, holding all animals sacred to the Gods. Again, there may be people who commit unspeakable acts against animals and/or other humans may claim to be Wiccan, but they are not following the Wiccan faith or the Wiccan Rede.

Many Wiccans meet in the woods or other natural settings because of their reverence for nature. Many say, "the Earth is our church." Many are secretive about their religious path because of the religious persecution they still experience, largely due to misconceptions and outright untruths that are told regarding their religious practices. Despite First Amendment guarantees, Wiccans and other Pagans are still fired from their jobs, their religion is held against them in child custody disputes, their parenting skills are questioned due solely to their religion, they are deemed unfit to run for political office or to hole appointed public positions, and sometimes whispered hate campaigns and stares cause them to "voluntarily" leave their places of employment. Various pastors of churches rail against them, directing parishioners to shun them or worse.

7) Wiccans are dangerous, and wish to undermine everything that Christians hold dear.

Most Wiccans are not anti-Christian. In fact, most Wiccans have better things to do with their lives than attempt to interfere in the religious practices of another. Like those of many other religious faiths, they simply do not believe that the Bible is truth and have instead chosen another path. Wicca teaches respect for other religious paths, and teaches that each person should remain free to experience their religious preferences in the way that they desire, so long as they harm no one else.

Wiccans tend to interfere with religious practices only when they are unfairly imposed on others without their consent without affording the same opportunity for other paths. For example, Christian prayers before public meetings.

Wiccans will generally provide information to those who ask about their faith, but are prohibited from prostheletyzing. They are also prohibited from recruiting your children, dragging them off to secret coven meetings or otherwise attempting to interfere with your relationship with your child.

8) Halloween is a Pagan holiday and if we celebrate it, we are actually worshipping Pagan Gods against our will.

There has been a lot of debate concerning Halloween and whether or not it is anti-Christian or associated with "evil." Most of the world's Wiccans celebrate holidays that correspond with pre-Christian harvest holidays and/or equinoxes. Many pre-Christian cultures celebrated holidays at these times of the year to mark specific points of the year that were in timing with their agrarian culture. As life focused around the harvest and whether they would have enough food to make it through the winter, these holidays were meant to give thanks to the Gods or to ask for the Gods' blessings as they began difficult times of the year. They would pray for the fertility of the fields and their livestock which was their only means of survival.

As Christianity became the dominant religion in these areas, the meanings of the holidays were changed, however the timing remained, as it was much easier for the populations involved to observe at those times. There has been much written on the historical facts surrounding the holidays, which can be easily found by Google search, so I won't bore you with them here.

Concerning Halloween itself, most Wiccans celebrate the aspects of the holiday specific to their religion. As Christmas has its secular aspects, like Santa Claus, and Pagan aspects such as the Christmas tree and the Yule log, as well as its Christian celebration of the birth of Jesus, Halloween, called Samhain or November Eve by most Wiccans, has religious aspects as well. It is a time of remembering those who have gone before. All Saints Day and All Souls Day are similar holidays in the Christian faith, although they are observed differently. As an aside, during Halloween, Wiccans keep their black cats inside as should everyone else due to unscrupulous individuals that do harm to them for their own, non Wiccan purposes.

9) We Don't Need to Pay Much Attention to Wiccans - Thank Goodness There Aren't Many Out There

Not all Wiccans wear jewelry or other accouterments indicating their religion. Therefore, there may be many more of them than are immediately visible. Most have no reason whatsoever to reveal their private religion to the world, especially given the number of misconceptions that are out there, and the rampant persecution they still endure. They are doctors, lawyers, police officers, military, teachers, parents, Republicans, Democrats, conservatives, liberals, activists, pacifists, heterosexuals, homosexuals, married, single, domestic partners, men, and women. They come from all walks of life, all socio-economic classes, and from most countries in the world. Despite all of their differences, the vast majority have no interest in interfering in the lives of or imposing their belief system on anyone else. They only ask the same consideration from everyone else.

The American Religious Identification Survey of the American adult population indicated that between 1990 and 2001, the Wiccan community grew by 17 times, making it the fastest growing religion reported. In 2001, 134,000 Americans identified as Wiccan. The Pentagon says that more than 1800 Wiccans are on active duty in the armed forces.

10) Wicca Isn't a Real Religion Anyway - It's a Cult

How do you measure a "real religion?" How do you define a "cult?" Many define a cult as a religious group that they've never heard of. Others, such as the FBI, define it by Isaac Bonewits "Advanced Bonewits Cult Danger Evaluation Frame" which consists of 18 factors which rate a group on a scale of 1-10 based on 18 factors:

1. internal control
2. external control
3. wisdom or knowledge claimed by leaders
4. wisdom or knowledge credited to leaders
5. dogma
6. recruiting
7. front groups
8. wealth
9. sexual manipulation
10. sexual favoritism
11. censorship
12. isolation
13. dropout control
14. violence
15. paranoia
16. grimness
17. surrender of will
18. hypocrisy

Wicca is a religion of control within the individual, with leaders who are generally democratic, who encourage practitioners to fully evaluate and explore their religious preferences. There is no dogma, no recruiting, and no front groups. The loosely affiliated group called Wiccans have no central authority and its individual practitioners are across the economic spectrum. Sexual manipulation and favoritism are not a part of Wiccan belief. Censorship is not tolerated and isolation is not practical given no central authority. Most Wiccan groups wish the best for those who want to leave and congratulate the person on finding a better path. The Wiccan Rede prohibits violence. While individual Wiccans may become paranoid or grim, they aren't common traits of the group. The vast majority of Wiccan groups demand that practitioners think for themselves, and there is no higher incidence of hypocrisy in Wicca than in any other religious group.

So is Wicca a "real religion?" In 1985, as a result of Dettmer v. Landon, 617 F. Supp. 592, the District Court of Virginia ruled that Wicca is a legally recognised religion and is afforded all the benefits accorded to it by law. This was affirmed a year later by Judge J. Butzner of the Federal Appeals Court fourth circuit (799 F 2d 929, 1986). While judges don't make a religion "real" it does provide a legitimacy. Wiccan clergy have been given rights in all 50 states to perform marriages, and have received the same in many countries around the world. Several Wiccan groups have been given IRS non profit 501(c)(3) status, and many more have been granted non profit corporate status across most states in the US.

In other words, Wicca is as real as any other religion.

11) I Have Questions That Weren't Answered Here

I'll be glad to try to answer them for you. Just drop a blog comment and I'll do what I can.

November 06, 2006

WARNING TO SOUTH DAKOTA- Duck and cover. That is all.

Cheney to go hunting on Election Day:


Vice President Dick Cheney will spend Election Day hunting in South Dakota, his press secretary said Sunday.


November 02, 2006

Wi-Fi Prevails at Boston Airport

Wi-Fi Prevails at Boston Airport:


Continental Airlines set up a free wi-fi access point at Boston’s Logan Airport. Massport, which runs the airport, forced Continental to shut down the AP, claiming 1) it might interfere with police communications, 2) it violated Continental’s lease, and 3) (most important) it competed with Massport’s $7.95 per day wi-fi service. (A personal aside: Massport’s only competition in bureaucratic incompetence in the Bay State is the Mass. Turnpike Authority, which brought you deadly falling ceiling tiles in the Ted Williams tunnel.)


Fortunately for those of us who travel there frequently, the FCC blocked the Massport bid for monopoly. This bodes well for entities that want to set up wireless access points - including those who dare compete with overpriced governmental offerings. This ruling is cheering for those who believe in Yochai Benkler’s approach to open wireless networks, and Jonathan Zittrain’s views on the generative Internet. It’s also nice to know that the airport can overcharge us for water, food, and other necessities, but at least may have some competition for our Internet needs.



Political Stances Vs. First Amendment...

So which political party is the "peace" party? Is someone for peace necessarily against any particular candidate? I know a lot of George Bush supporters who would also consider themselves "pro peace" but they'd better not say so near the polls. They might find themselves escorted out.

TheDenverChannel.com - News - Grandmother Escorted From Polling Center Because Of Button:


COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- A Colorado Springs woman who sported a button that read: "Grandmothers for Peace" as she cast her ballot early this week said she was pitched from the El Paso County Clerk and Recorder's Office.

Election officials said 63-year-old Rita Ague violated a law against campaigning within 100 feet of a polling place when she tried to vote Monday.

The county's acting director of the election department said it's the law. No one is allowed to wear anything political at a polling place.

Ague, a grandmother of four, said she has been wearing the button for 10 years because she believes in peace.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado said peace isn't a political stance, and tossing Ague out of a public building was probably unconstitutional.