" /> Psycho Sensei: July 2006 Archives

« June 2006 | Main | August 2006 »

July 31, 2006

TheDenverChannel.com - News - Marshals: Innocent People Placed On 'Watch List' To Meet Quota

TheDenverChannel.com - News - Marshals: Innocent People Placed On 'Watch List' To Meet Quota:


DENVER -- You could be on a secret government database or watch list for simply taking a picture on an airplane. Some federal air marshals say they're reporting your actions to meet a quota, even though some top officials deny it.

The air marshals, whose identities are being concealed, told 7NEWS that they're required to submit at least one report a month. If they don't, there's no raise, no bonus, no awards and no special assignments.
"Innocent passengers are being entered into an international intelligence database as suspicious persons, acting in a suspicious manner on an aircraft ... and they did nothing wrong," said one federal air marshal.

These unknowing passengers who are doing nothing wrong are landing in a secret government document called a Surveillance Detection Report, or SDR. Air marshals told 7NEWS that managers in Las Vegas created and continue to maintain this potentially dangerous quota system.

Utterly and absolutely ridiculous

House Passes Broad Mandatory Filtering Bill:


The House of Representatives has passed a bill that would force schools and libraries to block chat and social networking sites as a condition of receiving federal E-rate funding. This bill goes far beyond the already broad mandate that requires schools and libraries to filter out obscenity and "harmful-to-minors" content and would block access to many legal and valuable web sites and Internet tools. Because chat and social networking are woven into the fabric of Internet communication, a huge range of sites may be declared off limits in libraries and schools. The bill appoints the Federal Communications Commission as the arbiter of what can and cannot be accessed in libraries around the country, meaning that for the first time, the federal government would be getting into the business of evaluating and screening wholly lawful Internet content.

New Zealand news on Stuff.co.nz: Police nab smurfs for trampoline theft

New Zealand news on Stuff.co.nz: Police nab smurfs for trampoline theft:


Two blue smurfs were left with red faces on Saturday night after they were arrested by police for stealing a trampoline.

Senior Sergeant Brian Benn told NZPA two drunk 19 year olds, "dressed as smurfs", were seen carrying the trampoline along Richardson Street, Dunedin about 1am.

Smurfs are fictional small creatures who featured in the 1980s television series The Smurfs.

"When they saw the police had noticed them they dropped the trampoline and took off."

Mr Benn said police had to track them over several back yards.

"Two were located, but a third man got away," he said.

The men will appear in Dunedin District Court tomorrow.

So Let Me Get This Straight....

This guy is at his parent's house, standing in his parent's yard, and takes a picture with his cell phone, then gets ARRESTED? Are we NUTS?

STUDENT BUSTED FOR TAKING COP PICTURES:


A Penn State college senior was arrested after he pointed his camera cell phone at police activity in his neighborhood. A Philadelphia NBC News Channel 10 report says the family of Neftaly Cruz, 21, is claiming the cops had "no right to come onto their property and arrest their 21-year-old son simply because he was using his cell phone's camera."

Cruz had heard a commotion outside his parents' home and walked out the door to investigate it. When he saw the street lined with police, he flipped his phone open to take a picture. Within moments, an officer came to his back gate, put him into a police car, cuffed him and took him to jail. According to a neighbor's report, the cop spoke only once during this process, allegedly saying, "You should have just went [sic] in the house and minded your own business instead of trying to take pictures off your picture phone."

The charge against Cruz was based on a new law, allegedly prohibiting people from taking pictures of police officers with cell phones. Cruz is quoted as saying, "They threatened to charge me with conspiracy, impeding an investigation, obstruction of a investigation..." Larry Frankel of the local ACLU chapter, reportedly said, "There is no law that prevents people from taking pictures of what anybody can see on the street," adding that, "it's rather scary that in this country you could actually be taken down to police headquarters for taking a picture on your cell phone of activities that are clearly visible on the street." - ST

ABA Report Criticizes Inappropriate Use of Signing Statements

A thoroughly fascinating read, and something that deserves a lot more coverage than it is getting (as I've complained about before).

ACSBlog: The Blog of the American Constitution Society: ABA Report Criticizes Inappropriate Use of Signing Statements:


The American Bar Association's Task Force on Presidential Signing Statements and the Separation of Powers Doctrine released its Final Report with Recommendations today, in which it criticized President Bush's use of presidential signing statements to avoid enforcing laws passed by Congress. To date, the administration has issued over 800 signing statements challenging the constitutionality of bills signed by the President, about 200 more than all previous presidents combined. Moreover, many of Bush's statements have claimed the right to decline enforcement despite clear precedent to the contrary. Neil Kinkopf recently addressed the issue of signing statements in an ACS issue brief, Signing Statements and the President's Authority to Refuse to Enforce the Law. For a news account of the ABA's release of their report, check out Robert Pear's article in The New York Times.

Wired News: Virtual View Aids Plane Landings

Wired News: Virtual View Aids Plane Landings:


FARNBOROUGH, England -- Nail-biting blind landings in foul weather may soon be a lot less perilous, thanks to a new corporate jet equipment that could find its way into airliner cockpits.

The technology, known as Synthetic Vision Systems, displays a computer-generated view of the terrain ahead -- even in heavy fog or clouds, when the ground can be invisible to other advanced "vision" equipment such as infrared sensors.

Gulfstream Aerospace became the first executive plane maker to announce plans to offer an SVS aboard its jets. The deal was announced at last week's Farnborough Airshow.

Once certified by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, SVS will result in "more accurate tactical flight decisions by pilots and ultimately increased safety," Gulfstream said.

The Honeywell International equipment chosen by Gulfstream is a highly detailed, three-dimensional Global Positioning System satellite navigation screen for planes.

Only YOU Can Make a Big Difference

Don't want your machine taken over by spam bots to become a zombie, spewing spam from your brandy new DSL line? Buy a Mac :-). Or at least figure out how to button up your current OS to make sure that the bad guys can't use it to mess with the rest of us.

Meantime, I must thank the amazing Gaige for cutting down my personal spam load to perhaps 10% of what I WAS getting. The vast majority of what's left is filtered beautifully by Spam Sieve. Thanks guys!

BBC NEWS | Technology | More than 95% of e-mail is 'junk':


More than 95% of e-mail is junk, be it spam, error messages or viruses, report mail monitoring firms.

Analysis of the contents of millions of e-mails has revealed that less than 4% is legitimate traffic.

Further work has shown that most of this junk mail is originating on hijacked home computers.

E-mail security firm Return Path said 99% of the computers it monitors that send mail have been taken over by spammers or virus writers.

Return Path reached its estimate by calculating a "reputation score" for the 20 million net addresses of those machines.

The score was derived by analyzing the e-mail traffic sent through those addresses, the number of complaints filed about that address, and if the owner of that address responds to complaints.

The vast majority of these net addresses were not good net citizens, said George Bilbrey, spokesman for Return Path.

Only 1% of net addresses could be regarded as legitimate sources of mail.

July 30, 2006

Psycho Sensei's YouTube Stuff

In my copious spare time, I make videos of various and sundry things, mostly surrounding being surrounded by salt water and cool fishies and critters. YouTube seems to be the perfect place (mostly) to upload these videos for the enjoyment of whomever is interested in enjoying my various and sundry things :-).

You can see my happy fun videos at this link or just go to www.youtube.com and search for ooblick. What more fun could anyone want?

Trying My Hand at Salt Water Fishie Tanks

It was a typical story. The child came home with guppies from school meaning I had to get her a fish tank to put them in. This, of course, got me to thinking about why I didn't have a fish tank, and how I'd always admired cool salt water tanks. Thought turned to action and I bought a small 24 gallon salt water set up with various and assorted parts. The story of tank setup and what I've stocked it with thus far and ongoing trials and tribulations are at my new salt fishie blog called Reefer Madness .

As an aside, I was trying out iWeb and publishing to .mac, and I have to say that it's amazingly simple. Once again Apple does something good. Go figure :-)

July 29, 2006

The Little Cardinal

This morning there was a SMASH on the downstairs french doors, loud enough to go and check. Sitting on the ground on the side of the path was a beautiful little red and yellowish green cardinal, who looked like a female but smaller than an adult. She didn't look like a baby with their squat body body and crop sticking out, and it was very clear that she could fly, just not right at that particular moment. So I went and sat with her to make sure nobody like our feral cats or the evil doggies would bother her. Unfortunately, at that point Wes, not knowing that the bird was there, let the dogs out. So I scooped her up and took her into the house and put her in one of the dog cages to recover.

The little cardinal recovered rapidly and slithered between the bars of the cage and started flying around the bathroom, feeping. This was a clue that she was ok :-). I scooped her up again and took her outside where someone in the trees was feeping for her. She feeped back, and took off towards the sound.

Bye bye little birdie :-).

July 26, 2006

So why aren't more people up in arms about this?

Remember high school civics class, where we learned that the legislature makes the laws, and the executive enforces them? If the executive doesn't like the law the legislature has passed, he or she must veto the law. Not, apparently, if the executive is named Dubya. Our dear current president believes that by his will alone, he can choose not to enforce certain laws legally passed by the legislature and signed into law by him, if he basically writes a little note that says he doesn't have to. Back when I studied the constitution I didn't see an Amendment called the "I don't want to Amendment" for the President.

I'd like two questions answered. 1) Why aren't more people screaming about this rewriting of the constitution at the whim of one man and 2) why did it take so long for this to be "noticed?"

CNN.com - Dobbs: Why is the president ignoring our laws? - Jul 26, 2006:


NEW YORK (CNN) -- With upraised right hand and left hand on the Bible, each of our presidents, from George Washington to George W. Bush, has solemnly sworn to "preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution of the United States.

The American Bar Association claims President Bush has violated that oath by issuing hundreds of "signing statements" to disregard selected provisions of the laws that Congress passed and he signed.

A bipartisan, 11-member panel of the ABA found that President Bush is not only disregarding laws but using such signing statements far more than any president in history. In fact, Bush has used signing statements to raise constitutional objections to more than 800 provisions in more than 100 laws. All of the presidents combined before 2001 had issued only 600.

Your Karaoke Is Illegal

Hooray! In a step in the right direction, China is cracking down on "unhealthy" karaoke. However, I think ALL karaoke is unhealthy and should be banned in all countries as the one true evil.

Your Karaoke Is Illegal:


In what seems a reductio ad absurdium, the Chinese government is looking to crack down on “unhealthy” karaoke songs.  The Ministry of Culture will evidently issue regulations prohibiting the singing (using that term loosely) of such songs.  Instead, customers will have to choose from a selection maintained in a centralized database.

One interesting aspect of this plan is that it appears to meet several goals: greater control over popular media content, enhanced protection of intellectual property rights (particularly interesting if, as I suspect, most of the songs and artists are Chinese, not foreign), and possibly revenue generation for the government.  Censorship can have side benefits.

The amusing part of this is that China is apparently as ham-handed at trying to “get with the young people” as the U.S. government is.  Any regime that produces a rap version of Mao’s teachings has much to answer for.



July 22, 2006

Yet more people tired of waiting in Beirut

More stories are surfacing of people who have given up waiting for their country's government to help them, and are taking matters into their own hands. Usually, for astounding amounts of money.

Law.com - Lawyers in Padilla Case Hop a Freighter Out of Beirut:


Three defense attorneys in a Miami terrorism case who were trapped in war-torn Beirut while interviewing witnesses got tired of waiting for the U.S. Marines to evacuate them. So they hitched a ride on a Norwegian freighter.

The attorneys -- Orlando do Campo of the federal public defender's office in Miami, Andrew Patel of New York City and William Swor of Detroit -- along with an Arabic-speaking interpreter they hired arrived in Cyprus on July 19 and caught flights home the next day.

"I'm just glad we didn't wait for the Marines," Patel said in an interview from home Friday. "I don't see why the U.S. government couldn't just bring a boat into the harbor like all the other countries did. Most other countries, like Thailand and Bulgaria, found simpler ways to get their people out."

The four men were among an estimated 25,000 Americans trapped in Lebanon when Israeli forces began bombing Hezbollah targets there July 12. The United States has drawn criticism for not coordinating rescue operations for its citizens as quickly as other countries did.

July 20, 2006

Bad-Tempered Parrot Leaves a Bloody Clue

Bad-Tempered Parrot Leaves a Bloody Clue:


Now what would have happened if they tried to steal my boo gold? Hmmmmm. She would have said "I'm a bloooooooo chicken.... hello cockatoo....CHOMP"


LONDON (AP) - An ill-tempered parrot left English police a vital clue to the thief who took the bird from a pet shop. Tristand Maidment, 23, pleaded guilty Thursday to stealing a macaw named Mickey from a pet shop in Frome, southwestern England, last month.

Maidment said he couldn't remember being bitten by the parrot, but the wound left a trail of blood which allowed police to make a DNA match to the suspect.

Maidment also admitted charges of burglary and animal cruelty, and an unrelated count of theft. He was ordered to be held in custody pending a court appearance on Aug. 3.

How shallow the claims of the telcos

The "Net Neutrality" debate is one that I've largely stayed on the sidelines of. Not because I don't believe that consumers should have the freedom to choose whatever content they desire, subject to the bandwidth that they have purchased, but mostly because the "powers that be" have essentially turned everything regarding an Internet used first for communication and second for commerce directly on its head. Arguments against "them" are touted as consensus. And basically, the whole thing becomes painful and annoying. I should know. I've been fighting with those who insist that the Net has classes of citizenship (one for the corporate sponsors, one for the geeks, and one for the users) for almost 20 years now.

So what have I learned in those 20 years? Those that have the gold makes the rules, even if their previous attempts have failed so totally that they have to purchase the successes of others, pretend they created it themselves, and then steamroll anyone who was there before and remembers their bumbling prior acts. Thus it has been with telcos who woke up one morning and found that computer networking, which they had tried to destroy back in the 50s, was alive and well and living in several different places, from CompuServ, and AOL, and BBS systems, and FIDOnet etc., all in forms they had no direct control over. They sat back and watched things grow and morph and mutate into a more coherent Internet, then decided that what they needed to do was to set up their OWN conduit in hopes of recapturing their lost control. However, when they were no longer the monopoly player, they found that important things like customer service, reliability, and cost were important issues that would cause customers to actually go elsewhere! They basically gave up, but obviously still wished to maintain control, or at least a revenue stream over all of this communication that is going on despite them.

Then other corporations woke up and found that people were happily using it long before they even dreamed of booting up in the latest version of Windoze, and decided to change all the rules to suit them, take the domain names already in use, then label themselves "content providers" and the rest of us are "passive consumers."

So what's going to happen with "Net Neutrality?" The Telcos will convince (through their very high paid lobbyists) the Congress Critters who still can't boot their own machines, that the only way they can provide the high speed service that people are crying for, is to somehow (they don't tell us how yet) decide for those "passive consumers" what they really need. Arguments like John Quarterman's below will likely be conveniently ignored in the onslaught, and we will all lose. I still have a tiny shred of hope somewhere in there, but I've been disappointed SO many times before that I'm definitely not willing to bet on it.

Real Fast Broadband:


OK, I think I saw some confirming comments about my interpretation of Softbank ADSL's 50Mbps for $25/mo. offering.


For those who don't read Japanese, Try this.


Meanwhile, NTT has decided to get more subscribers than Yahoo Japan by using Fiber to the Home (FTTH). How fast is that? $100Mbps for $31/month.


Show me any U.S. city where individuals can by Internet access at speeds anywhere near that for prices anywhere like that.


Meanwhile, the company that started Japan's most recent broadband push, Softbank, is profitable.


And while U.S. telcos complain they need special treatment to do what Softbank and NTT have already done, NTT is already branching out overseas, offering 100Mbps in other countries. As a demonstration, it broadcast Superbowl XL back to Japan in high definition.


Hey, maybe that's how we'll finally get fast broadband stateside!


-jsq

EFF Defeats Motion to Dismiss

EFF Defeats Motion to Dismiss:


EFF scored a crucial early victory today in its litigation against AT&T over the company’s alleged participation in NSA surveillance.  The district judge issued this lengthy ruling in which he refused to dismiss the case at this juncture on the basis of the state secrets privilege, and also sounded somewhat skeptical overall about the government’s assertion that the litigation itself endnagers national security.  A key quote:


To defer to a blanket assertion of secrecy here would be to abdicate that duty, particularly because the very subject matter of this litigation has been so publicly aired. The compromise between liberty and security remains a difficult one. But dismissing this case at the outset would sacrifice liberty for no apparent enhancement of security.


More from Wired News here.



The Local - Mobile technology aids Swedish evacuation

The Local - Mobile technology aids Swedish evacuation:


Mobile technology aids Swedish evacuation

Published: 20th July 2006 14:29 CET

By Thursday morning, almost all Swedish citizens had been evacuated from Lebanon after a gruelling four-day, round-the-clock operation coordinated by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs in Stockholm.

Thoroughout the process there have been reports of chaos, disorganisation and a lack of information, blamed partly on the fact that Sweden only has a consulate, rather than an embassy, in Beirut.

Related Articles
Swedish evacuees arrive in Turkey
20th July 2006
Visa extensions for Lebanese visiting Sweden
20th July 2006
Swedish ferry docks in Cyprus
19th July 2006

But the Swedish evacuation effort, supported by mobile phone technology, has been held up as a "model of order" by commentators in other countries such as Canada, Australia and the US which, on Thursday, were only beginning their own evacuations.

The Toronto Star described how many Canadian families gathering in the sweltering heat were subjected to "the stress of seeing children or spouses left off the list" followed by hours of arguing.

"At about the same time, Swedish citizens had gathered in an air-conditioned hotel," wrote the paper.

"Their names were placed on a list only after they boarded buses that shuttled them to a first boat, which carried 1,600 Swedes to safety, and a second one that ferried away 300."

The Canberra Times reported that the Australian effort was being unfavourably compared with that of a number of countries including Sweden, while USA Today slammed America's apparent inaction, pointing out that three ships had been chartered by Sweden to carry citizens to Cyprus.

According to foreign ministry spokeswoman Nina Ersman, text messaging has been a major tool in the Swedish evacuation operation.

"In the last week we have sent out five text messages to everyone in Lebanon who is registered with a Swedish mobile network," she told The Local.


And Hooray for THIS!

Tired of misleading and ridiculous TV ads? "Do you breathe? Sue the doctor who delivered you 45 years later." "Got drunk and drove into a building? Sue the contractor who built the wall too hard." Enough is enough. Nothing has brought the reputations of attorneys and the legal profession to a lower point than these stupid advertisements. Time is overdue to clean them up.

Trial Lawyers Bar Backs Tougher Rules for Attorney Ads:


New York's Academy of Trial Lawyers says the proposed tough new rules on attorney advertising are welcome, overdue and, if anything, don't go far enough. "We need to take back the profession and restore some dignity so people respect and understand the causes that we stand for and realize that they are legitimate, appropriate and meritorious," says the group's president, Robert Lahm. The academy is the first major bar to comment publicly about the proposed rules announced last month.

It's About TIME!

Every state in the union, as well as Federal courts have rules of civil procedure that attorneys are supposed to follow. Each of these rules contain one similar to the Federal "Rule 11" which calls for sanctions against attorneys who bring frivolous lawsuits, and can result in providing the victim of the suit with court costs and attorneys fees for defending against it. It's about TIME that these rules are actually used.

Attorneys Hit With Sanctions Over Meritless Suit Against Tony-Winning Producer:


A Manhattan judge has thrown out a lawsuit brought against Tony Award-winning producer Dede Harris, which had alleged that her sexually inappropriate behavior caused an off-Broadway play to fail. Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Herman Cahn also sanctioned both a principal of Martian Entertainment, attorney Peter R. Stern, and the company's counsel, solo practitioner Andrew Schwab, $5,000 each. Cahn found that the suit was "plainly devoid of merit and undertaken as a vindictive campaign to harass" Harris.

July 19, 2006

Wired News: Gonzales: Bush Blocked NSA Probe

Yet another whitewash. You can't investigate the president's actions because the president won't allow you to see the documents in question. How wonderful. I truly wish I could do that if I'm ever accused of illegal or immoral behavior. Oh yes, you can investigate it, but I deny you access to see any of the evidence.

Wired News: Gonzales: Bush Blocked NSA Probe:


WASHINGTON -- Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Tuesday that President Bush personally blocked Justice Department lawyers from pursuing an internal probe of the warrantless eavesdropping program that monitors Americans' international calls and e-mails when terrorism is suspected.

The department's Office of Professional Responsibility announced earlier this year it could not pursue an investigation into the role of Justice lawyers in crafting the program, under which the National Security Agency intercepts some telephone calls and e-mail without court approval.

At the time, the office said it could not obtain security clearance to examine the classified program.

Under sharp questioning from Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Arlen Specter, Gonzales said that Bush would not grant the access needed to allow the probe to move forward.

"It was highly classified, very important and many other lawyers had access. Why not OPR?" asked Specter, R-Pennsylvania.

"The president of the United States makes the decision," Gonzales told the committee hearing, during which he was strongly criticized on a range of national security issues by Specter and Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, the panel's senior Democrat.

Last week, under a deal with Specter, Bush agreed conditionally to a court review of his antiterror eavesdropping operations.

Fired Due To Blogging

Seems that what you do on your own time is still something that some bosses seem to feel they should not only have control over, but can fire you for. Now, if this person was actually blogging from the office when she was supposed to be working, a time stamp proving that is certainly a reason to be rather upset with an employee. It can also be rather dodgy if one had mentioned the company in question, although this person didn't. Seems her "very old school" boss with the "plummy Oxbridge accent" was not amused.

BBC NEWS | World | Europe | Sacked UK blogger sues Paris firm:


Sacked UK blogger sues Paris firm
A British secretary in Paris is suing her French firm because she says she was unfairly sacked for writing a weblog about her home and office life.
The woman, who refuses to give her last name but has been widely named as Catherine Sanderson, says she was fired by Dixon Wilson for "gross misconduct".

The blogger, who uses the pseudonym La Petite Anglaise, says she was accused of bringing her company into disrepute.

Dixon Wilson, an accountancy firm, has not commented on the case.

On Wednesday, more than 200 followers of Ms Sanderson's blog urged her to keep fighting against the decision.

Responsibility

Where does one begin? I sit here once again, seething at our government and the short sighted people who find justification in tearing a country apart leaving their citizens to fend for themselves. As with all of these conflicts, the human beings in the middle are of little import, even to their own governments. Those chanting "Go Israel" or "Go Hezbollah" are missing the other sideS of the picture. The vast majority of these Lebanese are NOT involved, are powerless to do anything about it, and are being killed, injured, and terrified by what's going on from both sides.

Meantime, what about all of the other innocents from other countries who are there visiting family, conducting business, or just vacationing in what used to the the "Paris of the Middle East?" Just when it seemed that the civil war in Lebanon was finished, and the democracy we pressed for so hard was in place (although, as with the Palestinians, the US seems to only like democracy that votes the way our Administration thinks they should....bringing to mind Soviet "democracy" but that's another story) people went there for various reasons, thinking it relatively safe. As usual, the actions of a few are punishing the whole.

France, Denmark, Norway and other countries sent ships to get people out. As of this morning, 5 days after the crisis began, there had been no large scale (as in more than say 50 person capacity) equipment available to take Americans out. Those Americans who were lucky enough to get out through our own government were told to sign promissory notes, pledging to pay the costs for their rescue. Meantime, these other governments have mobilized and gotten people out INCLUDING Americans, with no requests for payment.

Finally this morning, the United States, the world's most powerful nation, sent a ship to get around 1000 Americans out, and rescinded the policy that they must pay for their evacuations. How generous. In an environment where all evacuation routes were destroyed or blocked, and the ONLY way out was through the intervention of other governments, our people have been left behind as a country we consider a friend is blasting all exits, and blockading the ports.

Meantime, Hezbollah is getting funding and supplies (including the rockets it is shooting into Israel) from Syria and Iran. Israel's actions have effectively shut off the means for Hezbollah to re-supply. How many rockets do they still have? Who knows? Why weren't they made to disarm? Some say because Hezbollah assassinated the Prime Minster who was going to disarm them. Does the average Lebanese person care as they are trying to exist? Since so many of them are running for their lives, I doubt they're very pro Hezbollah.

One American woman finally being evacuated with two small children mentioned that they had been in the war zone with bombs falling all around them for 5 days. Putting myself in her position, I don't know if I could have survived it. Those charged with the responsibility of getting that woman and others like her out of Beirut will never feel such fear for their lives over that long a period of time, and will not have the empathy necessary to get their asses moving a little bit faster. It's ironic that the US holds itself out as the policeman of the world, but as my friend Lauren says, "to serve and protect" means that we serve them, and they protect their own political behinds, and the rest of us "little people" who don't chew with our mouths open at international events, can eat cake.

I find myself once again unable to fathom my government's response to a crisis. And once again, I feel our people are getting the shaft. Hopefully, everyone will get out safely (including the innocent Lebanese) and our beloved government will take some of the resources from "saving" Iraq, saving Halliburton, and saving the future for the religious right everywhere, and save our own people for once.

July 18, 2006

CNN.com - Study: Scuba diving doesn't appear to hurt lung function - Jul 17, 2006

CNN.com - Study: Scuba diving doesn't appear to hurt lung function - Jul 17, 2006:


NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Contrary to some reports, scuba divers do not appear to have an accelerated decline in lung function, according to researchers at the German Naval Institute.

"Obstructive changes in lung function have been reported with cumulative scuba diving exposure," Dr. Kay Tetzlaff, of the University of Tuebingen, Germany, and colleagues write in the medical journal Chest.

To look into this, the researchers studied in 468 military scuba divers and a comparison 'control' group of 122 military submariners, all of them men. Specifically, the team tracked the participants' decline over time in lung performance -- measured as the maximum volume of air expired in one second (called the FEV1).

Tetzlaff's group conducted the tests in all of the subjects on at least three occasions over a period of at least 1 year. The average follow-up was five years.

Cruel and Hideous Punishment!

Oh the abject HORROR! How utterly utterly awful. Even worse than vegemite!

Australians Upset Over Loud Manilow Music:


SYDNEY, Australia (AP) - It could be magic for some, but the use of loud Barry Manilow music to drive away late-night revelers from a suburban Sydney park is getting on the nerves of nearby residents.


In a move reminiscent of U.S. efforts to drive former Panama strongman Manuel Noriega from the Vatican Embassy where he took refuge in 1989, the local council in Rockdale, in Sydney's southern suburbs, started a six-month trial of high-volume hits by Manilow and Doris Day to chase away car enthusiasts who were gathering on weekend nights at Cook Park Reserve.




July 08, 2006

Thomas Leavitt on Flag Burning

From Dave Farber's list. It is interesting that one who would not burn an American flag would be pressed to do so based on hypocritical actions by our own government.
===============

Dave,

Even though I'm somewhat of a radical, I would never burn the flag of
the United States, I have too much respect for the ideals it symbolizes,
and the meaning it has for so many of those folks who've fought under
it... except:

The day the U.S. Senate sends a Constitutional Amendment that bans
burning the flag onto the states, I will walk down to the town center
and with the utmost respect for the ideals it symbolizes, burn the flag
in protest - in protest of the hypocrisy and political pandering and
mis-placed priorities that the U.S. Senate has demonstrated.

The day such an amendment is ratified by the final state, I will burn a
flag and invite the local gendarmes to arrest me... and I sincerely hope
that I will be joined by many other individuals, so many, that the
absurdity of attempting to enforce such a law becomes self-evident, and
a repeal measure is quickly passed.

As a California resident, I have nothing but contempt for Senator Dianne
Feinstein's vote on this matter. She has propelled me from passive
dislike into active intent to block any and all attempts to endorse or
promote her campaign by the organizations I work with. As a
representative of an organization that participates in putting together
the local "progressive" doorhanger, I will do my best to ensure that she
not be listed on it.

To think that we came within a single vote of this being sent on to the
states is depressing beyond belief...

Regards,
Thomas Leavitt

-- Thomas Leavitt - 831-295-3917
Godmoma's Forge, LLC - www.godmomasforge.com
~~~ Web and Graphic Design made spiffy ~~~

Encrypted public key at http://www.thomasleavitt.org/thomas.asc

July 07, 2006

Busted for wearing a peace T-shirt; has this country gone completely insane?

After reading this article (thanks Frog) I got a headache. A literal headache. What IS happening to this country indeed? And he's right, if his T shirt said "Veterans for Tits" it would have likely been allowed, despite its sexist connotation. And you know something, we sit here and we take it. If I was an attorney in Chicago, I'd truly be tempted to take this case. As it was, i forwarded it to some who might.

Busted for wearing a peace T-shirt; has this country gone completely insane?:


Busted for wearing a peace T-shirt; has this country gone completely insane?
By Mike Ferner
Online Journal Contributing Writer


Jul 5, 2006, 01:49

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
Friday afternoon, drinking a cup of coffee while sitting in the Jesse Brown V.A. Medical Center on Chicago's south side, a Veterans Administration cop walked up to me and said, "Okay, you've had your 15 minutes, it's time to go."

"Huh?" I asked intelligently, not quite sure what he was talking about.

"You can't be in here protesting," Officer Adkins said, pointing to my Veterans For Peace shirt.

"Well, I'm not protesting, I'm having a cup of coffee," I returned, thinking that logic would convince Adkins to go back to his earlier duties of guarding against serious terrorists.

Flipping his badge open, he said, "No, not with that shirt. You're protesting and you have to go."

Beginning to get his drift, I said firmly, "Not before I finish my coffee."

He insisted that I leave, but still not quite believing my ears, I tried one more approach to reason.

"Hey, listen. I'm a veteran. This is a V.A. facility. I'm sitting here not talking to anybody, having a cup of coffee. I'm not protesting and you can't kick me out."

"You'll either go or we'll arrest you," Adkins threatened.

"Well, you'll just have to arrest me," I said, wondering what strange land I was now living in.

You know the rest. Handcuffed, led away to the facility's security office, past people with surprised looks on their faces, read my rights, searched, and written up.

July 01, 2006

Bad News and Good News

So we planned this huge party from hell at the house over the 4th. And I had given all these directions predicated on our house number on the mailbox out front. Seems that last night someone decided to hit and run the defenseless mailbox and knock the whole thing over. That sucks.

The good news is that dominos now takes INTERNET ORDERING!!!!