" /> Psycho Sensei: December 2005 Archives

« November 2005 | Main | January 2006 »

December 30, 2005

Internet Spying Same as Telegram Spying - John Quarterman

Internet Spying Same as Telegram Spying:


As usual, Bruce Schneier gets it right:


Bush's eavesdropping program was explicitly anticipated in 1978, and made illegal by FISA. There might not have been fax machines, or e-mail, or the Internet, but the NSA did the exact same thing with telegrams.


--
Project Shamrock
, by Bruce Schneier, 29 December 2005
Two decades ago the Senate Intelligence Committee chaired by Sen. Frank Church
determined that the National Security Agency (NSA) Project Shamrock,
which intercepted telegrams and analyzed them, was inappropriate domestic
spying.
NSA terminated that program.
Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA),
saying the executive had to get warrants for such sigint, and
creating a FISA court to issue such warrants.
This is the same court that the current administration bypassed,
ordering the NSA to collect information without warrants on communications involving U.S. citizens in the U.S.


As Bruce points out, this isn't about terrorism; it's about the separation
of powers mandated in the U.S. Constitution.
What's the point of fighting terrorists if you're going to give away what you're fighting for?


-jsq

New Puppy Pictures

For some serious "awwww" factor, you can see the puppies at six months at This Handy Puppy Link. These are Chinese Cresteds, and yes they come in both Puff and in Hairless forms in the same litter. The mommy was Luppy (hairless) and daddy was Calvin (also hairless) yielding a highly unusual 5 puppies, 4 of whom are puff and one hairless.

Police: Christmas slayings suspect shot at homes

This happened a few miles from my house. Just goes to show that lunatics may be living closer than you think.

Police: Christmas slayings suspect shot at homes:


The man responsible for killing four people, including his mother, on Christmas before taking his own life also shot at two houses four days earlier, police said Thursday. Nobody was injured but the "investigation has determined that Nathan Cheatham grew concerned about police discovering his involvement in these shootings," police said. A Fairfax County Police Department spokesman said it is possible that Cheatham's concern over being linked to the Virginia shootings could have prompted his murderous rampage.

December 29, 2005

Rice to Admit German's Abduction Was an Error

Ooops! So sorry! But all's fair in the "War on Terror." But wait...who declared this war, and just who is "Terror?" Surely we didn't declare war on Germany.... Or did I miss that memo?

Rice to Admit German's Abduction Was an Error:


BUCHAREST, Romania, Dec. 6 -- The Bush administration has admitted it mistakenly abducted a German citizen it suspected of terrorist links, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Tuesday after meeting with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

NSA inadvertently uses banned data-tracking "cookies" at Web site

NSA inadvertently uses banned data-tracking "cookies" at Web site:


By ANICK JESDANUN AP Internet Writer (AP) - NEW YORK-The National Security Agency's Internet site has been placing files on visitors' computers that can track their Web surfing activity despite strict federal rules banning most of them.

Popular urban legends partly to blame for avalanche of junk e-mail: South Florida Sun-Sentinel

So... if you're tired of the "well meaning" hoaxes, chain letters, "share this with your best friends" and the rest, it's a bit more of a problem than just annoying a few people. Ever wonder why sometimes it takes just a little bit longer to access the web, download your email, etc.? Here ya go...

Popular urban legends partly to blame for avalanche of junk e-mail: South Florida Sun-Sentinel:


Urban legends _ those weird stories that seem to take on lives of their own as they travel from person to person _ have likely been around for centuries. But in the last decade, the Internet has added a new, more encompassing dimension to the spread of false rumors. Fictitious e-mails designed to warn, generate laughter, provide inspiration or sometimes solicit money from recipients pour into computer inboxes every day, tying up servers and slowing down employees who spend time reading, deleting or sending junk e-mail rather than working.

Despite software designed to filter unsolicited e-mail, most people have yet to figure out an effective way to rid their computers of spam _ those annoying bulk e-mails from unknown senders offering great deals on everything from Rolex watches to Viagra. They can add to the dozens of e-mails from people they know who spend hours, often with good intentions, sending out poems, prayers, chain letters and stories of schemes and lurking dangers.


Web Browser Diversity - John Quarterman

Web Browser Diversity:


As I give talks, I continue to find, to my continued surprise, that many people don't know that there is any
alternative to Internet Explorer (IE).
The other day a webmaster of long acquaintance said something to the effect of:


Sure, I tailor my web pages for IE.
What else would anybody use?
And why would they?


(I usually attribute quotations or even paraphrases, but let's let that one remain nameless.)

Why? Because IE draws security exploits like honey draws flies. Because it has deep design flaws. Because it is less capable than all the other major browsers. Because having a single browser used by 90% of desktop users is inherently unsafe, no matter what the browser is, because it is a monoculture, which means that there is a possibility that an exploit could attack a large proportion of all desktop machines all at the same time. This isn't an academic concern, either, since there have been numerous IE exploits, including some, such as scob, for which there was no patch.

What else would they use?

There are quite a few choices readily available right off the net.

  • Firefox, which was developed by a former IE user who got tired of having to clean his system every few days of spyware and viruses introduced via IE.

  • Opera, a nice lightweight (in terms of code size, not functionality) browser.

  • Netscape 8, which
    according to this c|net article
    ,
    can emulate either Firefox or IE, without IE's main security flaws.

  • Deepnet Explorer, which the same article says is built on the IE codebase but cleaned up.

  • Safari, which comes with the Macintosh OSX operating system.


All of these browsers have tabbed browsing and RSS feeds, neither of which
does IE yet have.

Personally, I don't see emulating IE (as Deepnet Explorer and Netscape 8 can do) as a feature, because it lets webmaster be lazy and code only for IE, thus leaving excuses for users to use only IE.

Also, I favor browsers that work on multiple operating systems, so that you can keep a familiar browser even if you choose to change operating systems. So I'd recommend Firefox or Opera for that reason. They're also the two browsers I use.

-jsq


Practical Domestic Surveillance and Wiretapping Primer (Dennis M. Kennedy)

For any who wish to argue the facts rather than the emotions on either side regarding this very important issue.

Practical Domestic Surveillance and Wiretapping Primer (Dennis M. Kennedy):


I must confess that I find the legal analysis I've read on FISA, the NSA and the recent wiretapping news to be hard slogging indeed. Here's an example: "This is meant as an exceedingly tentative analysis, with the purposes of disaggregating the issues and of suggesting that there are several unresolved questions here." I guess so.

Instead, I prefer plain-spoken, just plain interesting and more informative posts like one called "Wiretap Mystery: Spooks React" on DefenseTech.org.

The post, among other things, references an excellent survey of domestic surveillance by security guru Bruce Schneier.

Even better, both the DefenseTech post and Schneier's post point you to other good resources.



December 23, 2005

My Name

When I was born, I was given a name. Over the years, I learned how to spell and write that name. Despite any difficulties in the complexity of that name, I eventually learned it and it became as much a part of me as my toes, or my nose. When I decided to marry, I married the man involved, but did not become his property, or change my identity by doing so. I do not have a "maiden name" as I do not draw some mystical line based the highly outdated impression that I became "non virginal" only after I got married. If other women choose to take their husband's last name, that is, of course, their choice. Some families I know have chosen a completely different name that both man and woman adopted after marriage. Whatever works.

So, imagine how I feel when my entire husband's family not only has given me his last name, but his first name and middle initial, after putting a big ass MRS. in front of it. I'm not quite sure which I find more offensive, someone making an assumption about something as highly personal as my name, or someone assuming that I am now defined SOLELY as an appendage of my husband, tacking essentially a "property of" sticker on my forehead. Him and Mrs. Him.

I've asked him to inform his family that neither my name nor my being has changed, but year after year I continue to get holiday cards addressed to Mr and Mrs. Him. So I guess this year I get to let them know myself in my own happy way.

December 20, 2005

US 'winning war' on e-mail spam

Oh really? You think? It's rather pathetic that my mailbox has been completely flooded with TONS of spam each and every day, especially during the overnight hours.

US 'winning war' on e-mail spam:


The number of unsolicited e-mails received in the US has dropped thanks to new measures, a report finds.

Emergency Intervention Needed

I'm afraid I'm finally going to have to admit it. My father, my dear ole dad, the sire of the Psycho Sensei, has a serious problem. He has, shall I say it, an addiction. There can be no other explanation. I've thought long and hard, trying to come up with a different explanation. As I sit here at Dulles Airport, about to board an aircraft to Albany, listening to a very LOUD woman nattering in Chinese on her cell phone, I pondered this issue, but looking at my in box, I could find no other explanation. An intervention is necessary.

As painful and difficult an intervention is on the entire family, I fear that there is no other response possible. The sheer depth of the addiction defies any other attempts at resolution. There is no other way - the man must admit he has a problem. The evidence is right in front of me.

Email after email filled with BOGUS NONSENSE clogs my in box. Pictures of fat cats that have been circulated more often than Viagra spam. Sappy insipid "brighten up your day" mails, dripping with cliches in colored all caps and bold type. And those horrible "jokes." Yes, those are undoubtedly the worst, and the most telling sign. Missives he calls "jokes" but nobody else finds funny stream their way into my in box at an alarming rate.

And does he take any responsibility for his behavior? Of course not! He told me in a previous email discussing this behavior that he is powerless and "must forward" these things to all and sundry. How dreadfully sad.

Please, help us to intervene before it is too late, and the ISP turns off his access FOREVER.

December 18, 2005

Non Combatant in the 'War on Christmas'

I have to admit, I was quite confused on this "War on Christmas." I saw the news stories on the grandstanding politicians complaining about inclusiveness and diversity, demanding trees be named "Christmas" and parties be named "Christmas." I saw various silly lawsuits. I saw the latest rehash of the "our kids can't sing Silent Night in school" hogwash, and I couldn't figure out what the issue was. Then I saw an interview on CNN yesterday with a Jewish radio host who stated that it was all set up in order to raise more funds for radical Christian groups trying to stir up trouble. That makes complete sense.

I have been Pagan since 1967, although I didn't really know what it was until 10 years later or so. I'm "out of the broom closet." I sometimes wear religious jewelry in public. However, if someone says "Merry Christmas" to me, I am not "offended" as some of these groups are claiming. Why should I be upset that someone has wished me a happy day on December 25th? I hope they have a happy day too. It doesn't hurt me, degrade my faith or offend me that someone has said something that they feel is a wish for my well being. I usually respond with "and a happy holiday to you too" or "same to you" or sometimes just "thank you."

When a person says "God bless you" they are bestowing a high honor upon you as they understand it. No one has ever said "God bless you" to me in anger, or for "bad" reasons (well, except for one case at a wedding when a guest came up to the bride after the Pagan ceremony, stared at me for a second, then spit out "God bless your marriage" turned on her heel and stomped off. My response was "the more blessings the better."). I tend to take the compliment as intended by the person, and thank them, meaning it because they truly meant it in a good way.

I have an interesting laugh about those who demand that decorated trees be called "Christmas Trees" when they are actually Yule Trees that have been usurped by Christianity for their celebrations. But that's another story...

That being said, I will stand up and scream if a public school is using my tax dollars to teach children to sing songs to any particular Deity or perceived Deity. This includes "Silent Night" or any other such song. These songs are inappropriate in the public school setting. The old argument that "we have a menorah therefore we are inclusive" just doesn't cut it in a country with Muslims, Hindus, Pagans, etc. Same argument has gone on for years regarding organized prayer in schools, and thus far the courts have all said no. So basically this is yet another non issue being made a big deal of. It's just another means of "stirring up outrage" that sometimes leads to more donations to various radical groups.

Recasting separation of church and state into a so-called "War" ignores the fact that most people, even most non-Christians, simply don't CARE if someone says "Merry Christmas" to them, or even "God Bless You." As for demanding to exert possession over parties and trees, that seems to me much less a "War on Christmas" and more like a "War on Non-Christians."

December 13, 2005

So Disappointed With Aperture

Like many photographers with HUGE libraries of digital photos, I eagerly awaited the unveiling of Apple's Aperture. At first glance, it looked like just what I needed - an easy organizer for digital photos that also does rudimentary "tweaking" of photos. So off I ran to the Apple Store online and bought the product. As always, it was shipped quickly and arrived happily at my house. That's when the disappointment began....

So there I was, sitting in front of my 2 mhz dual processor G5 with many trailing hard drives, with tens of thousands of photos on it, and put attempted to install the product. Nope, won't install unless you have at least 1 Gig of RAM. Annoying. Oh well, I had that on my laptop, and approximately 30,000 photos on there, so why not install it there, organize everything up, and then work on the G5 after I get more memory. It installed on the laptop, so far so good.

Then I found that in order to organize your files, Aperture copies them all. Gee, can't do that with the laptop with only 100 gigs of hard drive space. That's annoying, says me. It would have been very nice if Aperture could use the already existing iPhoto libraries without making copies, but alas this was not to be. Ok, so I backed everything up onto a firewire drive, deleted the photos from the powerbook, then imported everything back over, starting with small chunks.

Despite the small chunks, import crashed Aperture many times. In addition, it was S L O W. Very S L O W. In fact, it was so annoyingly slow that I just gave up and set things up to import the whole thing while I went to sleep.

Upon waking up, I found that just about everything had imported happily into Aperture without unhappy crashes. This was good. However, despite it being an organizer, there was no way I could find to take the entire library of files and look for duplicates, then perhaps choose the largest file and delete the others. Wouldn't THAT be a nifty thing to do? Nope, isn't such a function that I could find, so I started going through project after project, trying to find duplicates then resort the photos. This, was also insanely S L O W.

So tell me - they SAY that Aperture is supposed to replace iPhoto for those of us who have huge numbers of files. However, if it's barely usable because of its lack of speed and features that digital photographers might need, why bother? I really hope that 1.1 fixes some of this stuff.

Anyone know any REALLY STUDLY organizer programs for the Mac?

p.s. More annoyance. Tried to rate a photo. It rated it, then changed the display, showing only 200 photos, then S L O W L Y loaded the photos back in, and scrolled back to the top of the window, so I would have to then scroll all the way back down again, waiting for the display to catch up. Foo.

The Death of Tookie Williams

With all of the media surrounding the execution of Tookie Williams last night, I find myself again mulling over the death penalty itself. Coming from a very conservative family in the frozen tundra of NH, I believed that the death penalty was an appropriate way of meeting out justice. Someone commits murder, they should be murdered. Eye for an eye. Better for society because this person can never kill again. Deterrent for others. I believed all of that.

Then, I went to law school. I found there that my little world of black and white, right and wrong, pure good and pure evil, was an illusion based on lack of knowledge. Specifically, based on the myth that our justice system is "fair."

I believed that 9 unbiased individuals chosen from the public at large, can make the "right" choice after listening to two highly educated advocates who had studied the case, and presented the best information they could so that the wise jury could decide, based on all the facts, what the right outcome was. Law school changed all that.

Those who can afford an attorney who can take the time to thoroughly study each aspect of a case, and can then present that case are rare. Even more rare is finding 9 jurors who don't have built in bias, AND the intelligence to properly digest the information being provided. Of course, this cuts both ways, in that many guilty are released, but we can't disregard the fact that many innocent are incarcerated, and some of those are on death row.

Once you factor into the equation the cold fact that the poor can't afford attorneys, and have public defenders who routinely deal with over 100 cases per week, ensuring that there is no time to truly prepare and present a capital case. This is perhaps why so many poor, black defendants are on death row.

So why do 2/3 of Americans favor the death penalty? Perhaps it's because they believe the system is fair. Perhaps it's because it's favored by Judeo Christian ethics. Anyone who truly THINKS about the concept of irrevocably and finally removing life from another human being, sees that there are pros and cons, and both need to be considered.

From my standpoint, I err on the side of life. Do I think Tookie was "innocent?" I frankly doubt it. Were horrible things done? Oh yes. Shooting a person in the back while he was down, shooting another in the face... yes, awful things to be sure. But should "we" as a society, have the power of life and death over individuals when "justice" is an ideal that we strive for but don't always grasp? When "ordinary people" are not allowed to choose their President, how can they choose life or death for a given individual? I don't know.

December 09, 2005

Airline Security Theater Considered Harmful - John Quarterman

Go John. This is the exact same argument that's been put forth regarding the ADIZ around the DC area. All theater, no real use.

Airline Security Theater Considered Harmful:


Bruce Schneier
points out in Wired

that not only is airline security such as is currently supplied by TSA is mostly security theater to make people feel better
rather actually do anything to make them safer (he's said that before),
but he also listed numerous other problems and proposed what to do instead.
I've got a few further suggestions.


Some other problems Schneier listed:

  • the various no-fly lists were poorly designed and poorly implemented

  • critiques of that by Schneier and others were apparently removed from the TSA web pages

  • Registered Traveler programs don't improve security: they're about convenience and their vendors making money

  • even that last is dubious, since uptake has been much lower than expected

He sums it up by saying what everybody who has paid attention already knows:

Exactly two things have made airline travel safer since 9/11: reinforcement of cockpit doors, and passengers who now know that they may have to fight back.
Airline Security a Waste of Cash Wiredby Bruce Schneier, 02:00 AM Dec. 01, 2005 PT

Then he suggests what to do about it:

Everything else -- Secure Flight and Trusted Traveler included -- is security theater. We would all be a lot safer if, instead, we implemented enhanced baggage security -- both ensuring that a passenger's bags don't fly unless he does, and explosives screening for all baggage -- as well as background checks and increased screening for airport employees.

Then we could take all the money we save and apply it to intelligence, investigation and emergency response. These are security measures that pay dividends regardless of what the terrorists are planning next, whether it's the movie plot threat of the moment, or something entirely different.

If we used some of that money to improve emergency communications (fire, police, paramedics, etc.) in likely target areas for not only terrorist attacks but also for other big risks (hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, fires, etc.) we'd make the country more resilient. We could even do this by encouraging municipal wireless networks by having emergency responders' communications go over redundant wireless meshes that their communications budgets paid for, instead of the several non-interoperating types of communications networks they use now. All this should also provide an economic boost by making air travel much more pleasant and thus encouraging more people to fly, and by promoting a municipal wireless industry. 

Where's a politician willing to stand up and say what we're doing now isn't working, and we need to change to something that will do some good instead of wasting money?

-jsq


December 07, 2005

How Utterly Intelligent of Them...

In a totally intelligent move, these proponents of "Intelligent Design" used their hands rather than the much more difficult and time consuming idea of actually using discourse. So how does this square with the Fundamentalists' book about "turn the other cheek" and the rest of those things that talk about getting along peacefully with others?

Morons in the News: Criticize Intelligent Design, Get Assaulted and Beaten:


A Kansas University professor was hospitalized after religious
fanatics who disagreed with his position on Intelligent Design
attacked him...

Kansas University religious studies Professor Paul Mirecki is no
friend to fundamentalist Christians who support the teaching of
the non-theory of "Intelligent Design" in science classrooms.
And a pair of Kansan thugs have made it clear that in...

New IM worm chats with intended victims | CNET News.com

So here's my question - given the intelligence of most AOL users, how would they know the difference between a bot and a "person?" Most unsolicited IMs I get are made up of letters such as "R U M or F" or "How R U?" Could it be that the bot is actually brighter than the average AOL user? :-)

New IM worm chats with intended victims | CNET News.com:


You can now instant message with a worm.

A new worm that targets users of America Online's AOL Instant Messenger is believed to be the first that actually chats with the intended victim to dupe the target into activating a malicious payload, IM security vendor IMlogic warned Tuesday.

According to IMlogic, the worm, dubbed IM.Myspace04.AIM, has arrived in instant messages that state: "lol thats cool" and included a URL to a malicious file "clarissa17.pif." When unsuspecting users have responded, perhaps asking if the attachment contained a virus, the worm has replied: "lol no its not its a virus", IMlogic said.

The malicious file disables security software, installs a backdoor and tweaks system files, the company said. Then it starts sending itself to contacts on the victim's buddy list.

9/11 Commissioners Criticize Lack of Cybersecurity Progress...

But wait a minute! Isn't ICANN supposed to be dealing with the technical management of the Internet, which obviously includes security? Am I missing something?

9/11 Commissioners Criticize Lack of Cybersecurity Progress...:


9/11 Commissioners Criticize Lack of Cybersecurity Progress

We Don't Need No Steenking Constitution

Privacy? Who needs it? Americans have to show their "papers" before flying domestically. Our Administration argues that any American should be trackable at the whim of law enforcement without any probable cause whatsoever. The FBI may visit you if you speak out against the Administration. Come on, guys! Does anyone REALLY think that these abuses of our civil rights will do ANYTHING whatsoever positive for security?

Government Still Pushing for Cell Phone Tracking Without Probable Cause:


EFF Urges New York Judge to Reject Latest Surveillance Request

New York - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has asked a federal magistrate judge in New York City to reject a Department of Justice (DOJ) request to track a cell phone user without first showing probable cause of a crime. In a brief filed in New York on Tuesday, EFF and the Federal Defenders of New York argue that no law authorizes the government's request, and that granting the order would threaten Americans' Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches.

This latest briefing comes after a decision last week in Maryland denying a similar order, which combined with two recent denials published by federal courts in New York and Texas, represents an unprecedented judicial rebuke to the DOJ's surveillance practices. The DOJ's apparently routine practice of asking for and receiving cell-tracking orders without probable cause only recently came to light as a result of these newly published decisions; typically, such requests are made and granted in secret, without any public accounting.

"Even though three federal courts have now completely rejected the Justice Department's arguments for tracking a cell phone without probable cause, it is still asking other judges for these plainly illegal surveillance orders," said Kevin Bankston, EFF Staff Attorney. "How many public denials is it going to take before the Justice Department either stops seeking such orders altogether, or is willing to appeal one of these decisions and subject its baseless arguments to scrutiny by higher courts?"

The DOJ, despite claims that its cell phone tracking requests are routine, necessary, and perfectly legal, has so far chosen not to appeal any of the recent decisions.

For this brief:
http://eff.org/legal/cases/USA_v_PenRegister/EFF_FDNY_reply_brief.pdf

For more on cell phone tracking:
http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/USA_v_PenRegister/

Contact:

Kevin Bankston
Staff Attorney
Electronic Frontier Foundation
bankston@eff.org


More on John Gilmore, from John Quarterman

Gilmore v. Gonzales Tomorrow:


Tomorrow John Gilmore gets a hearing on Gilmore v. Gonzales.
On the fourth of July 2002 John attempted to board an airplane, was told he must show identification,
refused to do so, and was denied entry to the aircraft.
He has not flown since.
Instead, he sued.

The hearing will be

December 8th 2005 at 9am
9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Third Floor, Courtroom 3
95 Seventh Street
San Francisco, CA 94103

If you are familiar with the case and will be in San Francisco, it would be worth attending, especially if you're interested in helping elminate what Cory Doctorow calls "a back-door to mandating Soviet-style internal passports for travel."

If you are not familiar with the case, here is a very brief overview; see the above URL for more details. There is no published law that says travelers have to show identification to board airplanes (or trains, buses, cruise ships, etc.) not even the so-called PATRIOT Act requires this. Airlines claim there is such a law. The United States is not supposed to have secret laws. Especially one like this that violates the First Amendment (right to assemble) and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Showing ID on airlines was a hasty patch after TWA Flight 800 crashed in New York, so Bill Clinton would have something to say to the families. After 9/11, it became entrenched. Because it's been around a few years doesn't make it legal. Nor does that make it effective; any college student can tell you how to get a fake ID to get beer, and targetting searches actually makes it easier for perpetrators to beat the system, as a team of MIT mathematicians has proven, and experience already indicated.

Apparently nobody before Gilmore was willing to actually test this secret law.

What does this have to do with the Internet? Well, Gilmore was one of the earliest employees as Sun Microsystems, which produced some of the earliest Internet workstations, and he is one of the founders of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF); I've known him for many years. Plus if people are prevented from attending conferences to discuss Internet technical, business, or political matters because they won't or can't show ID, that affects the Internet and all of us.

A show of security is not the same as security. Ben Franklin said that anyone who would give up liberty to gain a little security deserved neither. In this case, we've given up liberty and lost security, too.

-jsq


NPR : Women Turn to Online Rentals for Handbags

Oh this is totally hilarious! Who REALLY looks at your handbag to determine your social status? Let me think. Mortgage or designer bag? Multiple car payments or designer bag? Heating for the winter, or a designer bag? Hmmm.... let me think now :-)

NPR : Women Turn to Online Rentals for Handbags:


Morning Edition, December 5, 2005 · Think Netflix for handbags: Instead of buying designer bags, more women are renting them online. For the price of a single designer bag, women can rent a year's worth.



Go John Gilmore!!!!

Good luck to John Gilmore, finally getting his day in court. How can we, in a supposedly "free society" be subject to laws that we are not allowed to SEE, let alone fight? How totally un-American! Kudos to John for having the balls to call them on it.

Secret ID Law to Get Hearing:


Internet freedom fighter John Gilmore is about to get his day in court, challenging the Bush administration's covert laws demanding travelers to show identification papers. By Ryan Singel.

December 06, 2005

Close Encounters of the Magenta Kind

So, after the amazing Mustafa fixed my hair color, I figured that perhaps the long and involved story about why it had to be fixed should be told. I mean, after all, what fun is it to just fix something without knowing why it was broken, eh?

One fine day, I decided I needed to cover some more of this icky grey hair that keeps propping up on the head of the Psycho Sensei. So I went off to my hairdresser of 20 years and she mixed up "the usual" and put it on my head in the usual way, and waited for it to cook, then rinsed it off and *EGADS!* A nightmare ensued.

You see, my lovely Culligan water softening system had shit the bed without telling anyone, causing serious mineral build up in my hair. This mineral build up "grabbed" onto the color, and everything in the bottom half was..... black.

Yes, it was black. I mean really black. Quite black in fact. After much confusion about what to do next, various consults with others, etc., we find that it is quite the process to attempt an "undo" given that my hair is so fragile (I was born with thin hair that has become very dry despite use of every hydrating substance (almost) known to humankind. Therefore, the attempt to "take it back" resulted in 1/2 red, 1/2 dark brown hair. It was kinda punk, but not my thing, ya know? Hairdresser then left me with many new "products" including an interesting looking red mousse that I set aside for the "right time" when my hair was perhaps monotonal.

Couple weeks later, after letting the hair "settle," we "took it back" again, this time to many shades of brown. Not quite so bad, but this multi toned hair was really getting to me, especially since the Psycho Sensei is a REDHEAD! Brown was just not "it." Mustafa fixed that, the red was back, the grey was gone, and all was well.

So today I thought I'd see how this lovely looking red mousse did. I sprayed it in my hands as one is wont to do with mousse, and put it in my hair. Then I noticed my hands were MAGENTA. Looking up, I noticed that everywhere I put the mousse was ALSO MAGENTA. Magenta streaks just do not "go" with red hair, nor with a 45 year old Psycho Sensei. This was quite scary. Upon getting my magnifying glass to read the tiny tiny print on the can, it said, "for professional use only" and "use gloves" underneath large all caps disclaimers and warnings in other languages that I had no idea what they meant.

"Oh dear," thought the Psycho Sensei, along with many other words that are unfit for a family blog. Multi toned again, only this time much WORSE than before (magenta and red truly do look hideous) back into the shower I hopped, slathering my hair (what was left of it) with a boatload of shampoo. Rinsing it ran a magenta river into the drain. I washed it again. More magenta. Again - a kind of pinky color. Amazing since I had only used a LITTLE. Finally, the rinse ran relatively clear, so I conditioned my poor now very clean but unhappy hair and wrapped it on a towel.

Here I sit, hair in a towel, concerned about any attempt to style it. Perhaps I will call Mustafa :-)

Epilogue: There's still a small amount of magenta. Man... what fun I'm going to have....

Free speech under Net attack, study says

Gee. Ya think?

Free speech under Net attack, study says:


In today's "remix culture," free-expression group says that copyright law is squelching rights.

December 05, 2005

JSQ on the Flood Control Act of 1928

Flood Control Act of 1928:


The levees and other flood control measures along the lower Mississippi valley are the responsibility
of the federal government because of a disaster long before Katrina:


If it keeps on rainin', levee's goin' to break, (X2)

When The Levee Breaks I'll have no place to stay.



Mean old levee taught me to weep and moan, (X2)

Got what it takes to make a mountain man leave his home,

Oh, well, oh, well, oh, well.




When the Levee Breaks
,
Bonham, Jones, Page, Plant, Memphis Minnie


Many of us have heard this Led Zeppelin song a thousand times
without knowing what it's about.
Memphis Minnie is listed as one of the songwriters because she originally wrote the song,
back in 1927, after the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927,
which displaced 700,000 people permanently and probably got Herbert Hoover elected president.


The Flood of 1927 inundated large parts of Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, and Tennessee.

On 1 Jan 1927 the levees at Nashville were overtopped at 56.2 feet;
Nashville is on the Cumberland River,
which is a tributary of the Ohio, which flows into the Mississippi.
Below Memphis, the river was in some places 60 miles wide and sometimes 30 feet deep.
Above New Orleans, levees were deliberately blown, causing the flood waters to go into several
poor parishes, thus avoiding flooding New Orleans.

There was no federal disaster assistance plan at the time. Public outcry nationally led to massive Red Cross and other assistance and the Flood Control Act of 1928 that made flood control the responsiblity of the federal government. This was partly because the track record of the local governments was not good; evacuations were spotty and sometimes skewed by race, relief supplies were mostly nonexistant, and that matter of local powers saving New Orleans at the expense of its neighbors.

It's pointless to point fingers at the current mayor of New Orleans or governor of Louisiana about the levees. While the track record of the local officials is once again bad (and I personally think many of them should be defeated at their next elections), the federal government has been in charge of the levees since 1928.

Speaking of elections, Herbert Hoover was Secretary of Commerce, and the national exposure he got in organiziing relief efforts helped him get elected president. Unfortunately for him, he promised more than he delivered, and partly as a result lost the election after that, to FDR. It's probably not overstating to say that the political fallout from the 1927 Flood was one of the contributing factors to the New Deal. Meanwhile, that famous kingfish populist Huey Long got elected governor in Louisiana, with numerous results both good and bad; I'm not sure good local government was one of them.

Meanwhile, even after the waters eventually receded by August 1927, few of the displaced could go home. As mentioned, 700,000 people had to move:

Don't it make you feel bad
When you're tryin' to find your way home,
You don't know which way to go?
If you're goin' down South
They go no work to do,
If you don't know about Chicago.

Many of them went to Chicago, leading to the blues music scene there, which produced the original version of this song by Memphis Minnie, and eventually one of Led Zeppelin's more popular songs. Disasters can produce enduring art.

But 700,000 people had to find new homes and jobs, Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover successively lost their jobs, and the levees became a federal responsibility.

Disasters of this magnitude can't be left to local governments; the federal government is the guarantor of last resort, and 77 years ago  explicitly took on the task of prevention for Mississippi River floods.

Risks of not fulfilling such promises go beyond merely monetary, to people's homes and livelihood, to politicians careers, to shifts in political makeup and basic government strategies. In this case, the burden of the levees lies squarely on the U.S. federal  government.

-jsq


Scary Scary Icky Pooh!!!

Oh NOOOO! We are DOOMED! There is snow on the way. The amazing behavior of the DC metropolitan area whenever there is a hint of snow is most amusing. Unfortunately for me, I had to go to the bank and post office this morning. The bank shares a parking lot with the Safeway. It was pretty clear that the zombie like purchasers of "bread, milk and toilet paper" were there in force, as I had difficulty finding parking at the bank, on the OPPOSITE end of the shopping center, where it was pretty much deserted.

The post office was also full of people, most of shipping holiday gifts before we get snowed in for the rest of our lives. Thank the Gods for click and ship. I don't have to stand in line, just walk in with a pile of boxes and dump them off. This is very very useful since I have to do so much shipping cuz of the webshop.

Traffic was scary today. Little tiny Great Falls with people rushing around everywhere so that they don't melt if they get a flake of the evil snow on them. MELTING! What a world!

Later on, as the snow actually began falling, the wail of sirens pierced the quiet scene filled with pretty snowflakes fluttering softly to the ground. Wes told me of several "horrendous" accidents as people who should not be allowed on the roads were sliding (can't call it driving) into other people, T boning each other, etc. etc. Oh the Winter Wonderland...

We're slated to get about 6 inches of snow tonight. I'd better check my bread, milk and toilet paper.

December 04, 2005

A Hairdresser Called Mustafa

Yes, I realize that this is wrong, just wrong, to have a hairdresser called Mustafa, but there he was, standing before us with a Batman like utility belt holding all manners of cutting tools, ready for his victim. In this instance, the victim was Morgan, daughter of Psycho Sensei, who insisted that she get her hair cut. Morgan was lucky. She did not inherit my thin, sparse hair. Instead, she got her father's long, thick, beautifully colored gorgeous hair. Hair that when we first met was hidden by one of those lovely haircuts you get when putting a cereal bowl on your head and tracing around, but over the years was allowed to grow into its lush and lovely wonder. Oh for hair like that....

But, I digress. Morgan did indeed have hair like that. Random strangers would comment on the beauty of her long thick hair. It was marvelous and shiny hair. Down to her waist, it was utterly wonderful. Of course, she hated it. "But MOM, it gets caught in the plastic chairs at school. I catch it in doors. I catch it in the bus seat. It rips chunks out of my head. I HATE IT!"

Grudgingly, I gave permission to get it cut.

We looked at hair styles together over the Internet. When I say together, I mean her in one room IMing me URLs, and me countering with other URLs. Of course, what she liked I hated and vice versa. Eventually, we came to a compromise. Then, when we were ready to go to the salon, she said "let's just let the hairdresser pick." *ARGH*

Thus came Mustafa, an interesting looking Turkish man, dressed in stylish black pants and a black shirt with tasteful white pinstripes. Mustafa with his utility belt showed Morgan various hair styles from which to choose. She chose an acceptable one, and I sat and watched as a full 12 inches of her beautiful hair was cut and packaged for Locks of Love. *sniff*

Mustafa did such a good job on her hair (it looks really good) that I let him do my color. Now I just have to get used to my long haired daughter not having those lovely tresses that I could use as a handle whenever she was getting away too quickly :-).

December 02, 2005

Get Ready for Blackberry Jam

JURIST - Paper Chase: Federal judge rules Blackberry settlement invalid:


[JURIST] US District Judge James R. Spencer [JTBF profile] of the Eastern District of Virginia [official website] Wednesday rejected the disputed settlement pact between the maker of the Blackberry [product website] comunications device, Research in Motion Ltd. (RIM) [corporate website], and the patent owner of the technology behind the device, NTP, Inc. The $450 million settlement, which the companies agreed to in March, but never finalized, would have ended NTP’s infringement suit against RIM, which wanted to enforce the agreement. Spencer will next determine whether to issue an injunction that completely halts Blackberry sales and service in the US. Industry experts believe the ruling will force RIM to settle the suit for as much as $1 billion. Nasdaq stopped trading Blackberry's shares shortly before the ruling was made public. AP has more.

Guess Even My Hometown Isn't Immune. *sigh*

<%Title%> - Concord Monitor Online - Concord, NH 03301:



olice disarmed a 14-year-old boy who showed up at West High School in Manchester yesterday with a loaded handgun stuffed in his waistband.
Police were called to the school after someone tipped off school officials about the gun, said Sgt. Mark Fowke.

With officers on the way, Assistant Principal MaryEllen McGorry escorted the boy from a classroom.

McGorry is a former Hillsborough County prosecutor who left the legal field to work first as an English teacher, then as a school administrator.

"We feel that she acted appropriately, swiftly and judiciously,"said Frank Bass, an assistant school superintendent.

The student became "agitated and combative" in the hallway when officers arrived and found the loaded .32 caliber handgun in his waistband, Fowke said. After a brief struggle, they confiscated the weapon.

The student did not threaten anybody with the gun, Bass said. No one was hurt, classes continued and police were investigating why the boy brought the gun to school.

The boy was suspended immediately for up to 20 days and faces an expulsion hearing before the suspension expires.

He also faces juvenile delinquency charges in Manchester District Court and possibly adult charges of unlicensed possession of a gun and resisting arrest, Fowke said.

Officials said school faculty did not consider the boy to be a dangerous or troubled student.

"There's been nothing in his past that indicated to us that he constituted a danger to the building," Bass said. Police wouldn't comment on how the boy obtained the gun or who told school officials about it.

City police post school resource officers in all public middle and high schools.

There are no metal detectors in Manchester's public schools now, but that could change, Bass said.

"We will talk to the police department and to our administration to find out if we need to do anything differently," he said.

------ End of article

By BEVERLEY WANG

The Associated Press

Betty Ford Center braces for wave of CrackBerry withdrawal cases

Oh dear. Whatever shall all of these people do? This is one of the reasons why I bought a Treo instead. Woo hoo.

Betty Ford Center braces for wave of CrackBerry withdrawal cases:


Millions of CrackBerry addicts may soon find themselves disconnected and yearning for a fix, now that a federal judge has denied Research in Motion's request to halt the proceedings in its legal spat with patent firm NTP (see "Worse comes...