" /> Psycho Sensei: August 2004 Archives

« July 2004 | Main | September 2004 »

August 27, 2004

Ok, Now I'm Really Confused

So there I was, combing through my regular RSS news feeds in my copious spare time, when I came across a story in Wired about how CAPPS II is being replaced by "Secure Flight." Always skeptical of these types of things, I read on, and found the following paragraph:

Secure Flight replaces a much-maligned previous TSA proposal known as CAPPS II, for Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System. Critics said it had insufficient privacy protections. Unlike CAPPS II, the new system will not seek to identify anyone other than known or suspected terrorists.

So wait just one minute here. They haven't been targeting anyone other than known or suspected terrorists up until now? Stupid me, I thought that the whole program was set up to prevent terrorism. If CAPPS II wasn't set up to target known or suspected terrorists, who WAS it targeted towards? Weight and balance violations (like Ted Kennedy)? ACLU lawyers? Greenpeace officials?

Gee, I feel so much better now.

August 25, 2004

HA! And Again....HA!

From www.silicaonvalley.com comes this lovely tail of "stick it in your ear, you evil people who want to squish the First Amendment right to parody. So THERE

This song's not your song, this song's not my song ... If you're going to threaten to sue someone for copyright infringement, you'd best be certain that the copyright you're protecting is still valid (see "Quoted, Tue., July 27, 2004"). If it's not, you may find yourself in a position similar to that of Ludlow Music, which threatened to sue the animators behind a wildly popular piece of political satire based on Woody Guthrie's "This Land is Your Land," only to learn that their copyright on the song expired more than 30 years ago. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which represented the animators in their run-in with Ludlow, Guthrie wrote the song in 1940, when the copyright laws granted a copyright term of 28 years, renewable once for an additional 28. When Guthrie sold the song in 1945, he triggered the first copyright term, which expired without being renewed in 1973. Ludlow filed its own copyright on the song in 1956 and renewed it in 1984, but EFF attorneys say it is superceded by Guthrie's, which when it expired put the song in the public domain. "We believe that Guthrie's classic tune, 'This Land Is Your Land,' belongs to all of us now, just like 'Amazing Grace' and Beethoven's symphonies," said Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney with the EFF. "The idea of copyright law is that, after a time, every work comes back into the hands of the public, where it can be reused, recycled, made part of new creativity without having to pay a fee or call in the lawyers. That's a great thing, the real genius of copyright."

The Problem is Partially Solved

After many stops and starts, and after some great and quick help from Six Apart, the Psycho Sensei has successfully upgraded to the latest version of the Movable Type software. Unfortunately, only part of the new feature set seems to be working. There is a provision for registration and authentication before you are allowed to post comments to the blog through a strange service called TypeKey, which is supposed to allow you to post to blogs. So I registered the site with them, registered myself with them, etc. and then tried to post a comment. It wouldn't let me. So I gave up and turned off that part, and switched things around so that now I will be able to look at comments before they get posted. So Psycho Sensei comments are back. Hooray!! And spammer comments are RIGHT OUT! Hooray again!!!

This is NOT absolutely hilarious

The PsychoSensei is once again disappointed in the greed and degree of disregard for others, seemingly inherent in some of humankind. I've had to shut down comments from truly interested parties with useful information that would benefit the community who reads these blogs, all because some parasites wish to suck work, creativity, and bandwidth from others in order to advertise their CRAP.

Overnight, I received 30 spams to my Art Magic website, which is the only site I have that accepts comments. The site is set up as a research project that makes it necessary for the group to enter comments to the entries.

May the perverted parrot droppings called spammers rot in the Bog of Eternal Stench.

This is absolutely hilarious

For all its money, and all its workers across most continents of the world, Microsoft has been seemingly best at producing lousy bug ridden software and some really funny "faux pas." As RS says about this one, "that's what happens when you get your vocabulary from rap music."

Microsoft has also managed to upset women and entire countries. A Spanish- language version of Windows XP, destined for Latin American markets, asked users to select their gender between "not specified," "male" or "bitch," because of an unfortunate error in translation.

Another blunder from Microsoft involved the use of chanting of the Quran as a soundtrack for a computer game, which was roundly denounced by the government of Saudi Arabia.The company later issued a new version of the game without the chanting, keeping the previous editions in circulation because Microsoft's U.S. staff thought this wouldn't be spotted. But the Saudi government banned the game and demanded an apology. Microsoft then withdrew the game.

More At This Handy Link

August 22, 2004

'Christian' animal sacrifice

There has been a call for all REAL Christians (i.e. those who follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, who I doubt would ever condone such actions as are being done to torment Darla Wynne) to send letters of condolence to Ms. Wynne through the South Carolina ACLU. This type of thing should be an affront to all thinking humans across the world. This woman's cat was killed and hanged for her to find. Her house has been vandalized multiple times. All because she chose a religion that teaches "an it harm none, do as you will."

United States: A parrot belonging to a Wiccan woman who launched a legal challenge to her town's unconstitutional prayers has been slaughtered in a highly ritualistic manner. Darla Wynne, of Great Falls, South Carolina, came home one night last week to find her parrot, Little One, beheaded with his heart cut out. A note warned her she would be next. It is just the latest in a long series of incidents.

Many of the town's 2,200 residents regard Wynne as a witch and disapprove of her pagan faith, she said. The vandalism has ranged from destruction of her cars to several of her animals being poisoned, Wynne said.

No one will say anything, Wynne said. They think they're protecting their own....

...Wynne said she has endured numerous verbal and written threats. She received by mail a booklet, Thou Shalt not Suffer a Witch to Live, and said a man yelled at her, Witch, you're going down.

Twice last week before her bird was killed, Wynne said she received threats in the mail.

Parrot's death latest threat to woman in prayer case - The Herald (Rock Hill), 17th August 2004.

[The Pagan Prattle Online]

I have authoritah!


United States: The War on Terror has a new target - role-playing games. A New York gamer had an interesting encounter with a Cartman employed by a ferry company to check bags for weapons:

This morning, they're doing bag searches again to get on the ferry. And the guy doing the searches pulls me aside and says, Sir, I feel that I need to confiscate this book.

I pause and say, in that tone of voice that most people would recognize as meaning, have you lost your grip completely, chuckles?: You need to confiscate... a book.

Yes. I feel it's inappropriate for the other people on the ferry to be exposed to it.

Now, I had the book IN MY BAG. It was not open. And while the Maiden of the Mirthless Smile is displayed as improbably proportioned, well, this is not, as far as I know, illegal to have. I mean, there was a guy carrying a copy of Maxim, and some of the women in THAT are improbably proportion. (All right, I admit: they're not wielding a huge sword and dressed in a bustier studded with human finger bones. But really.)

My response: Well, let me call the ACLU and have them come down here, and see what they think about your attempt to confiscate a book that was not in the plain sight of others due to your feeling it's not appropriate. And I pull out my cell and start scrolling down the list - ACLU-NJ is at the top, actually, before 'Amanda' and 'ardaniel' since it sorts alphabetically.

He gets all pissy at me and says, Don't you understand this is for your safety?

Confiscating someone's gun or bomb is for my safety. Perhaps confiscating someone's pocketknife or nailfile may be for my safety. What's so damn dangerous about my book?

It's INAPPROPRIATE!

That's NOT YOUR DECISION! I could be carrying a copy of Hustler in here, and it's STILL not your decision! You're looking for bombs and knifes and guns and things that hurt people, and a book that is IN MY BAG is not going to leap out of its own damn accord and HIT SOMEONE!

The rest of the people waiting for the ferry are watching our exchange. He realizes that they're all looking at him, and that I'm winning this one in their eyes.

He lets me go on the boat.

GRRR! - Sea and Sky and Land, 11th August 2004 (via Avedon).

[The Pagan Prattle Online]

August 21, 2004

RIAA Grinds Down Individuals in the Courtroom

Yet another case of the big bullies beating up on the little guys. That's unfortunately become a large portion of American Jurisprudence. And you know, it's about time something was done about it.

Iphtashu Fitz writes "The Associated Press recently reviewed many of the copyright infringement lawsuits that the RIAA filed against individuals charged with illegally sharing songs on P2P networks. According to the article over 800 of the targeted individuals have settled for approx. $3000 in fines. One man in California had to refinance his house to pay his $11,000 settlement. Many of the defendants are unwilling to face the possibility of even higher fines by fighting the suits in court despite the fact that it could resolve important questions about copyrights and the industry's methods for tracing illegal downloads. It seems that even some of the judges presiding over these cases question the RIAA's tactics. 'I've never had a situation like this before, where there are powerful plaintiffs and powerful lawyers on one side and then a whole slew of ordinary folks on the other side,' said U.S. District Judge Nancy Gertner, who blocked the movement of a number of these cases in her courtroom for months. She wanted 'to make sure that no one, frankly, is being ground up.'" (doj, michael) [Slashdot.org]

August 20, 2004

Senator Blacklisted by No-Fly List

Are they sure he was on the no fly list because he's a threat and not because he might cause the weight and balance on the aircraft to be dangerously out of range?

sig writes "Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) was turned down for a flight from Washington, D. C. to Boston because his name turned up on the TSA No-Fly list. He eventually got on a flight, but was again denied on his way back to D.C. It took 3 weeks of calls to Tom Ridge and the Department of Homeland Security for the ordeal to get straightened out. But what are ordinary citizens supposed to do if the Secretary of Homeland Security won't take their calls?" There's also a New York Times story. (usa, michael) [Slashdot.org]

Important Copyright Ruling Favors Freedom

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has upheld the Grokster decision, in which a peer-to-peer file-sharing service was ruled not to be violating copyright law. In that decision, a federal judge ruled, essentially, that a product that has legitimate uses can't be deemed illegal because some people use it for unlawful purposes.

The appeals panel's ruling (PDF) makes vital points including these:

"The Copyright Owners urge a re-examination of the law in the light of what they believe to be proper public policy, expanding exponentially the reach of the doctrines of contributory and vicarious copyright infringement. Not only would such a renovation conflict with binding precedent, it would be unwise. Doubtless, taking that step would satisfy the Copyright Owners' immediate economic aims. However, it would also alter general copyright law in profound ways with unknown ultimate consequences outside the present context.

Further, as we have observed, we live in a quicksilver technological environment with courts ill-suited to fix the flow of internet innovation. AT&T Corp. v. City of Portland, 216 F.3d 871, 876 (9th Cir. 1999). The introduction of new technology is always disruptive to old markets, and particularly to those copyright owners whose works are sold through well established distribution mechanisms. Yet, history has shown that time and market forces often provide equilibrium in balancing interests, whether the new technology be a player piano, a copier, a tape recorder, a video recorder, a personal computer, a karaoke machine, or an MP3 player. Thus, it is prudent for courts to exercise caution before restructuring liability theories for the purpose of addressing specific market abuses, despite their apparent present magnitude."

This is an important ruling, and let's hope its logic spreads widely.

(Via Michael Geist via Interesting People.) [Dan Gillmor's eJournal]

August 16, 2004

A Terrible Week

A good friend lost her baby, Hurricane Charley hammered Florida, and then yesterday, we had to put my Filix cat to sleep. As expected, I am very sad, with a massive hole in my heart.

Filix (named after the final approach fix at Gaithersburg Airport) was chosen by my daughter as an addition to our family in 1999. He was an 8 month old kitten at the time, and almost immediately we found that he had difficulties. He was diagnosed with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and various other immune disorders. His breeder didn't seem to care, and just wanted to know if we wanted to "exchange it." How could anyone send an animal back to someone like that? He was put on a special diet, and medications.

Filix was a very intelligent cat who amazed us with his brains and methods of communication. Whenever something was not quite right, Filix would come over to us, sit down squarely in front of us, and MEOWL until we paid attention. It was usually something like a door being left over, or Spot getting locked in the bird room. He and Spot were very close, and usually slept together in their little cat bed. His fur was softer than any cat's I ever had. He loved vanilla ice cream, and would demand it when he wanted it.

When Spot died, Filix was devastated. He went into a physical tail spin that he did not recover from, despite very strong medications including chemotherapy drugs. He would spend days not eating, and losing weight to the point where yesterday he weighed 4 pounds. I fed him with a spoon, trying desperately to keep him eating. We gave him fluids by needle, B12 shots, force fed him ensure, and begged him to eat anything at all. He gave up a few days ago and totally refused to eat even tuna, salmon, beef, pork, or anything else. It was clear that he took no pleasure in most of anything, and I didn't have the heart to force him anymore. Rather than let him starve to death "naturally," we made the decision to help him along. It was done yesterday afternoon. I couldn't attend because it was too painful.

Wes brought his tiny body home, and we buried him near his best friend, Spot. I cut his thread and lit a green candle at the head of his grave and said goodbye. I have a pillar candle burning as long as it lasts to light his way, although I feel he's already gone to his reward and/or his next incarnation. I miss him terribly.

August 15, 2004

Goodbye to Filix Kitty

It was time. He wouldn't eat, he was totally miserable, and he needed to go home. Of course, I'm very sad. It's just not fair to have to lose two loved animals in less than six months. Although I know it was the right thing, it hurts a lot to lose someone you love. And to those who say "it was just a cat" no life is "just" an anything. So I say goodbye, knowing in my heart he is in a better place.

August 12, 2004

Government Hides Cell Reliability Info

According to Wired News, the FCC is using the "terrorism" excuse to deny the public information about the reliability of wireless network infrastructure.

The FCC began collecting information about the phone network in 1991 and made the information public, precisely because the regulators thought the public had a valid need for that information.

But since Sept. 11, the need to protect against highly skilled, well-educated terrorists who use the Internet to examine infrastructure outweighs the advantages of full disclosure, according to an FCC official.

In the name of vague, indefinite fears, with no end in sight, the government is taking information out of the public market. The carriers love it, because it gives them one fewer area in which they need compete -- a form of legally sanctioned collusion -- the government puts another check mark next to "doing something," and the public loses yet another government service.

We have always been at war with Oceania.

[Wendy: The Blog]

August 06, 2004

Filix Isn't Doing Well

My poor ocicat named after the final approach fix at Gaithersburg is declining quickly again. Today I thought he would be done for, and rushed him to the vet fully expecting them to pull out the blue juice so we could say goodbye. Fortunately, his breathing problem was a head cold and not the lung problem I feared, so we topped him up with fluids, gave him another B12 shot, and he was sent home. Tonight he ate about 2 teaspoons of food, which is better than it was, but definitely not perfect. He's only 7, so this shouldn't be happening so early. For those of you who don't know, poor Filix was the victim of an unscrupulous breeder who didn't care what genetic abnormalities were passed through to the kittens. He has inflammatory bowel disease, which is really awful. He's not ready to give up yet, so I won't either. Think good thoughts his way.

August 03, 2004

How Amusing....NOT

Some lamer tried to steal one of the Psycho Sensei's domain names. They attempted to initiate a transfer through Open SRS, the main registry controlling my domains. The good news is that Open SRS is a smart registry, who CHECKS with the domain name holder before they do these things (unlike other ones who get sued over it?)

The amazing GBP Software, my ISP has fixed it so bad people can't mess with me anymore. Yay Gaige. Boo Bad Guys.

So Why Has Our Threat Level Been Raised?

Quite interesting that so quickly after the Democratic National Convention we have a sudden attention grab back to the "War on Terror." It was just TOO convenient, as are so many things in this political campaign. An interesting spin on the whole thing is in Capitol Hill Blue

The increased terror alerts in New York, New Jersey and Washington are based more on President George W. Bush's political campaign needs than any actual threat and the information used to justify the alerts is three years old, intelligence pros complain.

The alerts, planned weeks ago, came right after the Democratic National Convention in Boston as a carefully-orchestrated attempt to play on Bush’s strengths in the war against terrorism and blunt any momentum challenger John F. Kerry might have coming out of the convention.

Much of the "new" information cited as reasons for raising the alert dates back to 2001.

More here